Version Changes
Revised. Amendments from Version 1
According to referees comments we revised the following points: - We clarified the correlation of GP versus Anisotropy (fig 7) and introduced the recommended calculation of relaxation time in place of anisotropy, taking into account for the measured lifetimes. - We realized extra experiments for samples preparation and compared extensively direct dyes mixing with lipids and DMSO loading. - We discussed and clarified the word "LUV" we use in the manuscript. - We added a comment on plasma membrane lipids content.
Abstract
Microdomains corresponding to localized partition of lipids between ordered and less ordered environments are the subject of intensive investigations, because of their putative participation in modulating cellular responses. One popular approach in the field consists in labelling membranes with solvatochromic fluorescent probes such as laurdan and C-laurdan. In this report, we describe a high-yield procedure for the synthesis of laurdan, C-laurdan and two new fluorophores, called MoC-laurdan and M-laurdan, as well as their extensive photophysical characterization. We find that the latter probe, M-laurdan, is particularly suited to discriminate lipid phases independently of the chemical nature of the lipids, as measured by both fluorescence Generalized Polarization (GP) and anisotropy in large unilamellar vesicles made of various lipid compositions. In addition, staining of live cells with M-laurdan shows a good stability over time without any apparent toxicity, as well as a wider distribution in the various cell compartments than the other probes.
Introduction
Numerous physiological processes take place at the cell plasma membrane and its organization into domains participates in modulating many cellular responses 1. In animal cells, the external leaflet of plasma membranes (PMs) is mainly composed of phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin and cholesterol while the inner leaflet contains significant amounts of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine 2. Studies on in vitro model systems such as membranes isolated from cells or liposomes prepared either with synthetic lipids or extracted from PMs of cells from various sources have been instrumental in understanding the formation of lipid domains in biological membranes 3, 4. For example, pure sphingomyelin is known to form solid like phase (So) at physiological temperature 5, due to its long acyl chain. In cell membranes containing cholesterol, however, cholesterol and sphingomyelin have been shown to interact and form liquid ordered phases (Lo) surrounded by a liquid disordered phase (Ld) essentially comprised of phosphatidylcholine 2.
Results obtained with artificial model membranes are, however, difficult to transpose to natural membranes and research performed on intact live cells is preferred 6. In this context, fluorescent probes incorporated directly into cells are used extensively to reveal and characterize lipid domains, at sufficiently low concentrations that they should cause minimal disturbance to the membrane organization 7, 8.
For labelling biological membranes, two main classes of fluorescent molecules are usually used 8. The first one is composed of lipids such as phospholipids, sphingolipids, gangliosides or cholesterol that are attached to classical fluorescent dyes like fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and nitro benzoxadiazol (NBD) 9, 10. Such probes can be used to image domains because of their preferential partitioning to certain phases in models as well as in cell membranes 11. The phase preference of these dyes is a subtle equilibrium between the fluorescent part of the molecule, the acyl chains and the interaction with the surrounding lipids of the membrane, thus some narrow changes in molecular interactions may shift the probe partitioning 12, 13. The second class of dyes developed for studying order in biological membranes are molecules with fluorescent moieties which are highly sensitive to the surrounding micro-environment. One of the most commonly used families of probes is laurdan and its derivatives 14, 15, whilst other probes include Nile Red 16, di-n-ANEPPDHQ 17, 3-hydroxy-flavone 18 and 2-anthroyl lipid derivatives 19. For such probes no preferential phase partitioning is expected.
Laurdan, and other related fluorescent molecules containing 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoyl naphthalene are environment-sensitive dyes which exhibit a large Stokes shift correlated to the polarity of the surrounding medium 20, 21. This effect comes from intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) when solvent relaxation occurs, as well as from local excitation (LE), without solvent relaxation 22. In polar solvents, the emission is red shifted compared to apolar ones 23. When laurdan is embedded in lipid bilayers that contain no sterol, a transition from solid (So) to liquid disorder (Ld) phases results in a large red shift 20. The fluorescence modulation can originate from complex processes including reduced solvent relaxation due to lipid packing and high micro-viscosity, abrupt water molecules gradient through lipid bilayers 24, possible H-bonding with donor lipid groups 25 and/or dyes bending and sliding along the z-axis 26. Complex lipid mixtures including sphingomyelin and cholesterol can also modulate the fluorescence parameters due to specific lipid/lipid and lipid/dye interactions 27. Recently, Kim et al. 15 synthesized and characterized C-laurdan, which also shows great sensitivity to changes in lipid order in the bilayers, but labels the plasma membrane of cells more efficiently than laurdan. Because C-laurdan is not commercially available, we decided to synthesize it ourselves. To achieve this, we revisited the synthesis of 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoyl naphthalene, the precursor of laurdan, which also provided us with access to two new candidate probes molecules that we called M-laurdan and MoC-laurdan, in addition to laurdan and C-laurdan. Here we report the thorough characterization of the photophysical properties of these four probes in parallel, both in solvents and in model membranes. We also show their possible use to label live tissue culture. We show that, among the four candidate probes, M-laurdan looks as a particularly interesting alternative to laurdan or C-laurdan to label live cells.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and solvents
Chemicals and solvents were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and ultra-pure water was used for buffer preparation (Milli-Q 18 MΩ, Millipore, France).
Dioxane/water mixtures and pure solvents
A series of media covering a range of dielectric constants from 2 to 60, corresponding to the variation of the polarity of a bilayer from the center to the lipid head group, was obtained by mixing the right amount of dioxane in water. The dielectric constant was taken as the linear combination of a mixture of non-polar (1,4-dioxane, ε 20°C=2.2) and polar (Water, ε 20°C=80.1) solvents according to their molar fraction 28. Other experiments were carried out using pure solvents with dielectric constant ranging from 4.8 to 33 and classified as non-polar (chloroform), polar aprotic (dichloromethane, acetone, acetonitrile, dimethylformamide) and polar protic (ethanol, methanol) media. For all experiments, the dyes were dissolved in solvents to a final concentration of 1 µM, starting from dried residues.
Large Unilamellar Vesicles (LUVs)
DPPC (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) and cholesterol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Porcine brain sphingomyelin (BSM, containing 50% C 18:0 and 21% C 24:1 as major compounds) and egg sphingomyelin (PSM containing 86% C 16:0 as major compound) were from Avanti Polar Lipids. Large Unilamellar Vesicles (LUVs) were obtained by sonication. The amounts of chloroform stocks of lipids and dyes, calculated to obtain a final concentration of 100 µM for the lipids and 1 µM for the probes, were mixed in glass tubes. The chloroform solvent was first evaporated under nitrogen flow and then under vacuum for 2 hours. 3 ml of MOPS buffer (3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid, 10 mM, pH 7.3, NaCl 100 mM, EDTA 10 µM) was then added (at a temperature 5°C above the gel-to-liquid phase transition T m for DPPC, BSM and PSM, and at room temperature for the other lipids and lipid mixtures). The tubes were then sonicated for 5 minutes (immersion tip diameter 3 mm, delivered power 18 W, Bioblock, France) and kept at 4°C overnight before use. Liposomes obtained by sonication are usually mostly comprised of SUVs (15 – 50 nm in diameter), but the size of those quickly increases due to events of fusion, resulting in a population of larger vesicles comprising a mixture of relaxed SUVs, MLVs and OLVs. Characterization of those lipid vesicles by dynamic light scattering (DLS) showed that the main population of vesicles had sizes ranging from 150 to 350 nm in diameter depending on the mix of lipids used to prepare the liposomes. For simplicity, we simply refer to such vesicles as LUVs in the rest of the manuscript. The OD at 500 nm was checked systematically, to ensure that it remained below 0.05 to avoid any inner filter effect.
The compositions of the lipid mixtures were chosen on the basis of the literature (see Table S1).
Fluorescence spectroscopy
Absorption spectra were recorded on a Specord 205 spectrophotometer (Analytik Jena, Germany), fluorescence spectra on a FLSP920, lifetimes on a TCSPC Model 199 (both from Edinburgh Instruments, UK) and anisotropy on an automated home-built set-up allowing to control and change the temperature of the sample.
Fluorescence emission spectra were recorded over the range from 370 to 600 nm with excitation set to 360 nm on a thermostatic sample holder. Lifetimes were recorded at 460 nm, with 380 nm pulsed LED for excitation (PLS 370, Picoquant, Germany). POPOP was used as a reference for quantum yield (Φ=0.97 in cyclohexane) and lifetime (τ=1.35 ns in ethanol) 29. Anisotropy was recorded by integrating the fluorescence emission through a band pass filter (450/50) and polarizers with appropriate orientations (excitation set to 360 nm) at temperatures ranging from 10 to 60°C (2°C step increments).
Quantum yield was calculated using the following equation 29:
where S is the area of the integrated intensity, OD is the optical density and n is the refractive index (r for reference sample).
Fluorescence decay times were analyzed as a sum of exponentials using a least-squares algorithm according to the following equation 30:
in which I i is the steady-state intensity and τ i is the lifetime ( ).
Mean fluorescence lifetime was calculated as follows 31:
were is α i the normalized pre-exponential factor and τ i is the lifetime of the decay i.
The reported anisotropies were corrected for instrument response (G-factor) and calculated using the following expression 32:
were I xy corresponds to the fluorescence intensity recorded for vertical (v) or horizontal (h) polarizer position (x for excitation path, y for emission path).
The Generalized Polarization (GP) was calculated from the measured fluorescence intensities at 440 and 490 nm 33:
Labelling of tissue culture cells
COS7 cells, obtained from ATCC, were grown in DMEM + 10% fetal calf serum and passaged 1/10 by trypsinization every three or four days. For microscopy, COS7 cells were left to adhere overnight on sterile glass coverslips (Thermo Scientific Menzel). Cells were then rinsed twice with PBS with no serum, before incubating at 37°C with the probes diluted to 10 μM in PBS with no serum, for 15 minutes for C-laurdan and 30 minutes for the other three. The cells were then rinsed twice with PBS + 10% FCS warmed to 37°C.
Two-photon fluorescence microscopy
Cell imaging was performed on a LSM 710 NLO-Meta confocal microscope with spectral detection (Zeiss, Germany) coupled to a two-photon laser source (Chameleon Vision II, Coherent, France). Images were taken through a 40x/1.2W objective under controlled environment (37°C, 5% CO 2). Images were recorded in one pass from 420 to 600 nm with 10 nm steps (excitation, 720 nm). GP maps were calculated with ImageJ (NIH) from images recorded at 440 and 490 nm using the formula described above and a custom-built macro (available upon request).
Results and discussion
Synthesis
To simplify and ameliorate the synthesis of the laurdan family dyes, we revisited the synthesis procedure of their precursor, 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoyl naphthalene, by taking advantage of a Fries rearrangement in methane sulfonic acid, as proposed by Commarieu et al. 34. Using commercially available standard reactants, naphthol-2 and lauroyl chloride, this precursor was produced with a yield of nearly 100% in two reaction steps including the Fries rearrangement.
Based on this common precursor, four fluorescent probes related to laurdan were obtained: 6-dodecanoyl-2-(dimethylamino) naphthalene (laurdan), 6-dodecanoyl-2-(methylamino) naphthalene (M-laurdan), 6-dodecanoyl-2-[N-methyl-N-(methoxycarbonyl) amino] naphthalene (MoC-laurdan) and 6-dodecanoyl-2-[N-methyl-N-(carboxy-methyl) amino] naphthalene (C-laurdan) ( Figure 1). Laurdan was produced using dimethylamine. M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan were produced following the protocol reported by Kim et al. 15. All dyes were produced with satisfactory yields using conventional chemistry facilities. Finally, the four compounds were purified by thin layer chromatography and characterized by 1H-NMR (see SI attribution peaks). Dyes formulae, molecular weight and basic photophysic characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1. Synthesis pathway of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan.
Reagents and conditions: a] Naphthol-2, Lauroyl chloride (triethanolamine); b] Fries rearrangement, Methane sulfonic acid; c] (CH 3)2NH HCl, Na 2S 2O 5, NaOH, H 2O; c'] CH 3NH 2 HCl, Na 2S 2O 5, NaOH, H 2O; d] BrCH 2COOCH 3, Na 2HPO 4, CH 3CN; e] KOH, EtOH.
Table 1. Dyes formulae, molecular weight and basic photophysic characteristics measured in chloroform.
| Name | Laurdan | M-laurdan | MoC-laurdan | C-laurdan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formula | C
24H
35NO
|
C
23H
33NO
|
C
26H
37NO
3
|
C
25H
35NO
3
|
| M.W.(g/mol)* | 353.55 | 339.52 | 411.59 | 397.56 |
| Molar extinction
coefficient ε (M -1cm -1)** |
19500 | 14100 | 11100 | 12200 |
| Quantum yield Φ*** | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.56 |
| Brightness (ε-Φ in CHCl 3) | 11900 | 8200 | 5300 | 6800 |
*Calculated using C=12.011, H=1.008, N=14.007 and O=15.999 (atomic weights). **ε measured at 360 nm in CHCl 3. ***Φ measured in CHCl 3.
Photophysical characteristics in solvents
In order to evaluate the possible influence of the nature of the solvent beyond its dielectric constant on the photophysical properties of the four probes, we carried out measurements in dioxane/water mixtures with dielectric constants spanning a broad range of values ( Figure S1), and next in a variety of pure solvents with dielectric constants ranging from 4.8 to 33 ( Figure 2 and Table 2). From the steady-state measurements in dioxane/water mixtures, for all four dyes, we found a linear correlation between the measured GP and the dielectric constant of the media ( Figure S1). In contrast with these results obtained in dioxane/water mixtures, low values of GP were seen only in the pure solvents ethanol and methanol, which are both polar protic solvents with dielectric constants above 20 (ε EtOH=25 and ε MeOH=33). The other photophysical characteristics, quantum yield and lifetime (Φ, τ), were found to be rather constant for all the probes except for C-laurdan, for which the quantum yield was seen to decrease very significantly in protic solvents and polar aprotic solvents with ε>20.
Figure 2. Spectroscopic properties (quantum yield, Φ; lifetime, τ; Generalized Polarization, GP) of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan in various solvents.
Blue, non-polar solvent ( ◆ chloroform), red, polar aprotic solvents ( ■ dichloromethane, ◆ acetone, ▲ acetonitrile, ● dimethylformamide), green, polar protic solvents ( ▲ ethanol, ◆ methanol). Experiments were performed twice and reported values are mean ± SD (not visible error bars are below the size of symbols).
Table 2. Photophysical parameters of the dyes dissolved in pure solvents at a final concentration of 1 µM.
ε refers to the solvent dielectric constant, quantum yields ϕ are measured using POPOP as reference (ϕPOPOP=0.97 in cyclohexane), lifetimes τ are recorded at 460 nm (excitation, 380 nm) and reported along with the goodness of the fit χ 2 (POPOP was used as reference for deconvolution, τPOPOP=1.35 ns in ethanol), kr (ϕ/τ) and knr ((1-ϕ)/τ) are the deexcitation constants deduced from quantum yields and lifetimes, Generalized Polarization, GP, are calculated from emission intensities at 440 and 490 nm.
| Solvent | laurdan | MoC-laurdan | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ε | ϕ | χ² | τ (ns) | kr (ns -1) | knr (ns -1) | GP | ϕ | χ² | τ (ns) | kr (ns -1) | knr (ns -1) | GP | |||||||
| Nonpolar | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHCl 3 | 4.8 | 0.61 | 1.53 | 2.78 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 3.03 | 2.30 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.72 | ||||||
| Polar aprotic | |||||||||||||||||||
| DCM | 9.1 | 0.67 | 1.99 | 2.97 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 4.62 | 2.38 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.73 | ||||||
| Acetone | 21.0 | 0.61 | 1.53 | 2.94 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 1.81 | 2.36 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.71 | ||||||
| MeCN | 37.5 | 0.63 | 1.82 | 3.11 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 1.50 | 2.83 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.61 | ||||||
| DMF | 38.0 | 0.67 | 1.81 | 3.19 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.53 | 1.46 | 3.03 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.54 | ||||||
| Polar protic | |||||||||||||||||||
| EtOH | 24.6 | 0.68 | 1.81 | 3.05 | 0.22 | 0.10 | -0.72 | 0.45 | 1.77 | 3.10 | 0.15 | 0.18 | -0.20 | ||||||
| MeOH | 33.0 | 0.53 | 1.80 | 2.64 | 0.20 | 0.18 | -0.85 | 0.40 | 1.93 | 3.05 | 0.13 | 0.20 | -0.44 | ||||||
| Solvent | M-laurdan | C-laurdan | |||||||||||||||||
| ε | ϕ | χ² | τ (ns) | kr (ns -1) | knr (ns -1) | GP | ϕ | χ² | τ (ns) | kr (ns -1) | knr (ns -1) | GP | |||||||
| Nonpolar | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHCl 3 | 4.8 | 0.58 | 6.74 | 1.95 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 2.50 | 2.46 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.67 | ||||||
| Polar aprotic | |||||||||||||||||||
| DCM | 9.1 | 0.48 | 2.70 | 1.95 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 1.87 | 2.36 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.72 | ||||||
| Acetone | 21.0 | 0.46 | 4.99 | 2.06 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.13 | 1.87 | 2.29 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0.57 | ||||||
| MeCN | 37.5 | 0.55 | 1.63 | 2.66 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.60 | 0.10 | 2.43 | 2.27 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 0.43 | ||||||
| DMF | 38.0 | 0.62 | 1.68 | 2.83 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 2.31 | 2.52 | 0.03 | 0.37 | 0.32 | ||||||
| Polar protic | |||||||||||||||||||
| EtOH | 24.6 | 0.55 | 2.48 | 2.85 | 0.19 | 0.16 | -0.20 | 0.17 | 2.72 | 1.46 | 0.12 | 0.57 | -0.61 | ||||||
| MeOH | 33.0 | 0.38 | 2.38 | 2.38 | 0.16 | 0.26 | -0.48 | 0.16 | 4.45 | 1.26 | 0.13 | 0.67 | -0.74 | ||||||
For all four probes, the GP was low only in protic solvents, i.e. ethanol and methanol ( Figure 2), presumably because of those solvents’ capacity to make hydrogen bonds. The Lippert plots of the four probes were found to be linear with a similar slope, which leads us to conclude that the different dyes are similarly sensitive to solvent polarity ( Figure S2).
Next, we characterized the fluorescence of the four dyes in water at a final concentration of 1 µM. For this, we used two procedures of solubilization: either directly from dried dye residues, or indirectly, using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) loading ( Figure S3). For the indirect procedure, similarly to what is commonly performed for labelling cells, dye stock solutions were prepared at 1 mM in DMSO and injected at 1:1000 into water 7. For laurdan and M-laurdan, no fluorescence and extremely low absorption were detected in the solution obtained directly from dried residues. In the solutions obtained by DMSO loading, very weak fluorescence signals were detected, which may correspond either to slightly improved solubility or to the probes remaining in complexes with DMSO. Our data are in agreement with the well-known insolubility of Laurdan in water 35. The fluorescence intensity of the MoC-laurdan obtained from dried residue was significant but with a very marked blue shift, suggesting that dyes were not surrounded by water molecules and quite possibly aggregated. For the MoC-laurdan solution obtained by DMSO loading, the fluorescence was very high, with the emission maximum near 460 nm at the time of the measure. This suggested that the probe remained in an environment with a lower dielectric constant than pure water and thus probably remained conjugated to some DMSO molecules for extended periods of time. For C-laurdan, Kim et al. 15 have previously reported that this dye is soluble in water. Accordingly, we detected an intense fluorescence, with the spectra being independent of the solubilization procedure utilized. The emission spectrum was red-shifted, with a maximum at 520 nm compared to 425 nm in chloroform, which could correspond to the dye sensing a protic surrounding.
Altogether, we conclude that i) laurdan and M-laurdan are probably almost insoluble in water when starting from dried residues, and have very low fluorescence in water when injected with DMSO, ii) MoC-laurdan can fluoresce in pure water, but may either aggregate if placed in water directly, or remain associated to DMSO when this is used to dissolve the probe iii) C-laurdan is soluble and fluoresces in pure water.
Insertion of the fluorophores into LUVs
For labelling model bilayers, we employed the most adequate procedure which consists in the direct assembly of fluorescently labelled LUVs. This entails direct mixing of lipids and fluorescent probes in chloroform, followed by steps of desiccation to remove the organic solvent, and then by rehydration in buffer, which includes a sonication step (see Materials and methods). In contrast, this direct procedure cannot be applied to label live cell membranes. An indirect procedure is then applied where the fluorescent solvatochromic lipid probes are commonly solubilized into DMSO before large dilution in serum-free culture medium and addition to cells 36.
Using laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan on LUVs made of DPPC, DPPC/cholesterol (6:4) and POPC, we performed GP and anisotropy measurements to compare both types of samples and we found no detectable difference, suggesting that the presence of low concentrations of DMSO in the samples does not have any significant effect on this kind of probes ( Figure S4).
Next, we examined the capacity of the four probes to label LUVs, using the common procedure of adding them solubilized in DMSO as it is the case for live cell membrane labelling. We first estimated the time required for the insertion of 50% of the fluorophores from the measurement of fluorescence intensity over time after injection of dyes on LUVs made of DPPC/cholesterol (6:4) ( Figure 3A-left panel). For laurdan, M-laurdan and MoC-laurdan, fluorescence was found to increase over time, to reach a plateau around 60 minutes, with the first fluorescence measurement recorded 1 minute after injection being close to zero. From our data, we estimated the half insertion times to be in the range of three to 6 minutes for M-laurdan, and 10 to 15 minutes for laurdan and MoC-laurdan. In contrast, C-laurdan fluorescence intensity recorded 1 minute after injection was already high and stayed constant during the course of the experiment. For MoC-laurdan, the maximum value of the emission spectra shifted from 460 to 425 nm over the course of the experiment, suggesting that the probe was still mostly conjugated with DMSO at the early time points (< 5 minutes) and inserted progressively in the bilayer at later times. The large differences observed between the insertion times of the various probes probably originate from differences in their hydrophilic head volumes. C-laurdan is the only probe among the four to carry a head group which can be partially ionized, i.e. the carboxylic group. This probably contributes greatly to C-laurdan's water solubility and fast membrane incorporation. All in all, however, the insertion times of all four probes are compatible with membrane labelling of live cells.
Figure 3. Time dependence of dyes incorporation into LUVs and COS7 cells.
A (Left panel): Incorporation of the dyes into LUVs resulted in an increase of the fluorescence intensity over time. Unlabeled LUVs made of DPPC/chol (6:4) (100 µM, sample volume 3 ml) were mixed with dyes dissolved in DMSO. The final dye concentrations were 1 µM and the DMSO/water ratio 1:1000. Measurements were carried out at 20°C and fluorescence intensities were recorded at 440 nm. The fitting curve was obtained using a one site binding equation. B (Right panel): For flow cytometry (FACS), cells were harvested as a single cell suspension in tissue culture medium + serum after trypsinization and washed twice with PBS with no serum. For each probe, 1 µl of stock solution at 2 mM in DMSO was mixed with 2 million cells in 200 µl PBS (10 µM final) at room temperature. After 10 minutes, the tubes were placed in a water bath at 37°C for 30 min, before cells were washed twice in 5 ml and resuspended in a final volume of 1 ml with PBS + 10% serum warmed to 37°C. Cells were then further incubated for 20 min at 37°C. Every 10 minutes throughout the procedure, the volume corresponding to 250.000 cells was taken from each sample, placed on ice in a final volume of 500 µl ice-cold PBS + 10% serum, and submitted to FACS analysis on a LSR II flow cytometer with a UV laser and using the channel with a 450/50 BP filter.
Probing model bilayers in pure Ld states
To record the bilayer characteristics measured with the four probes we chose two phospholipids: POPC, a major component of biological membranes as well as DOPC, a phospholipid seldom encountered in nature, but which is broadly used as a model to generate raft-like domains in membranes 37. At room temperature, pure POPC and pure DOPC are known to assemble into Ld phases 38, 39. Accordingly, GP values, as a function of temperature, remained low for all probes, in agreement with the high level of hydration of the lipid bilayer in Ld states ( Figure 4). GP measured on pure DOPC were systematically below those measured in pure POPC, indicating a higher degree of hydration in DOPC bilayers.
Figure 4. GP and anisotropy of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan dyes in model membrane in Ld phase (orange/red color codes depicting liquid disordered phases).
When anisotropy was measured, as a function of temperature, laurdan and M-laurdan gave similar values, whereas lower values were found for MoC-laurdan and higher for C-laurdan ( Figure 4). This could stem from a difference in the transverse positioning of the dye into the bilayer affecting their rotational mobility, or from different fluorescence lifetimes.
The fluorescence lifetimes were thus measured and found to be very similar to one another for the first three: laurdan (<τ> POPC=3.19 ns, <τ> DOPC=3.04 ns at 20°C), M-laurdan (<τ> POPC=3.16 ns, <τ> DOPC=3.33 ns at 20°C) and MoC-laurdan (<τ> POPC=3.03 ns, <τ> DOPC=3.17 ns at 20°C). For C-laurdan, fluorescence lifetimes were 30% shorter compared to the others (<τ> POPC=2.26 ns, <τ> DOPC=2.13 ns at 20°C) ( Table 3). The rotational relaxation time is directly correlated with the order parameter through the Perrin-Weber equation. Those were thus calculated from anisotropies and lifetimes values ( Table S2). Laurdan, M-laurdan and C-laurdan exhibit similar values indicating that those dyes have similar constraints in the bilayers. For MoC-laurdan, the lower rotational relaxation time could thus indicate a more superficial insertion of the probe that may be due to its bulky head group.
Table 3. Lifetimes measured for dyes in various lipid environments at 20°C and 50°C (excitation 380 nm, lifetimes recorded at 460 nm, POPOP used as reference, τ=1.35 ns in ethanol).
In the table, the lines in blue correspond to bilayers in So phase, in green in Lo, and in red in Ld.
| Sample | laurdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20°C | 50°C | ||||||||||||
| χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | ||
| DPPC | 4.43 | 56 | 6.18 | 44 | 0.53 | 5.82 | 4.26 | 100 | 2.89 | - | - | 2.89 | |
| PSM | 1.29 | 57 | 4.96 | 43 | 2.50 | 4.28 | 1.84 | 78 | 3.15 | 22 | 1.06 | 2.97 | |
| BSM | 1.55 | 67 | 4.25 | 33 | 1.96 | 3.82 | 2.15 | 68 | 2.79 | 32 | 1.03 | 2.53 | |
| DPPC/chol (6:4) | 4.53 | 60 | 5.75 | 40 | 0.61 | 5.41 | 2.03 | 100 | 4.03 | - | - | 4.03 | |
| PSM/chol (2:1) | 3.31 | 69 | 5.58 | 31 | 0.61 | 5.34 | 1.56 | 100 | 3.68 | - | - | 3.68 | |
| BSM/chol (2:1) | 1.50 | 90 | 4.73 | 10 | 2.52 | 4.61 | 1.57 | 100 | 3.20 | - | - | 3.20 | |
| POPC/chol (2:1) | 1.45 | 100 | 4.35 | - | - | 4.35 | 1.89 | 100 | 2.79 | - | - | 2.79 | |
| DOPC/BSM/chol (1:1:1) | 1.49 | 94 | 4.42 | 6 | 2.05 | 4.36 | 1.63 | 38 | 3.09 | 62 | 2.92 | 2.99 | |
| DOPC/PSM/chol (1:1:1) | 1.73 | 81 | 4.43 | 19 | 0.70 | 4.30 | 1.62 | 100 | 2.88 | - | - | 2.88 | |
| DOPC/chol (2:1) | 1.49 | 100 | 3.75 | - | - | 3.75 | 1.66 | 100 | 2.48 | - | - | 2.48 | |
| DOPC | 1.50 | 79 | 3.23 | 21 | 1.44 | 3.04 | 1.84 | 65 | 2.81 | 35 | 0.83 | 2.54 | |
| POPC | 2.69 | 79 | 3.28 | 21 | 0.43 | 3.19 | 4.04 | 100 | 2.49 | - | - | 2.49 | |
| Sample | M-laurdan | ||||||||||||
| 20°C | 50°C | ||||||||||||
| χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | ||
| DPPC | 1.75 | 81 | 5.05 | 19 | 1.05 | 4.86 | 1.31 | 100 | 3.28 | - | - | 3.28 | |
| PSM | 1.36 | 58 | 4.69 | 42 | 2.14 | 4.06 | 1.64 | 82 | 3.23 | 18 | 1.67 | 3.07 | |
| BSM | 3.11 | 28 | 5.09 | 72 | 2.97 | 3.81 | 3.07 | 83 | 2.82 | 17 | 1.86 | 2.70 | |
| DPPC/chol (6:4) | 5.17 | 60 | 4.80 | 40 | 0.67 | 4.45 | 1.42 | 100 | 3.83 | - | - | 3.83 | |
| PSM/chol (2:1) | 2.66 | 68 | 4.55 | 32 | 0.51 | 4.36 | 1.67 | 100 | 3.67 | - | - | 3.67 | |
| BSM/chol (2:1) | 1.29 | 61 | 4.83 | 39 | 2.90 | 4.29 | 1.43 | 100 | 3.31 | - | - | 3.31 | |
| POPC/chol (2:1) | 1.50 | 100 | 3.98 | - | - | 3.98 | 2.12 | 100 | 3.06 | - | - | 3.06 | |
| DOPC/BSM/chol (1:1:1) | 1.43 | 61 | 4.19 | 39 | 3.83 | 4.06 | 1.65 | 100 | 3.29 | - | - | 3.29 | |
| DOPC/PSM/chol (1:1:1) | 2.50 | 82 | 4.06 | 18 | 2.12 | 3.85 | 1.63 | 100 | 3.15 | - | - | 3.15 | |
| DOPC/chol (2:1) | 1.49 | 100 | 3.81 | - | - | 3.81 | 1.41 | 59 | 3.33 | 41 | 2.78 | 3.12 | |
| DOPC | 1.76 | 92 | 3.40 | 8 | 1.89 | 3.33 | 1.41 | 65 | 3.37 | 35 | 2.01 | 3.04 | |
| POPC | 5.99 | 64 | 3.42 | 36 | 0.64 | 3.16 | 1.64 | 75 | 3.11 | 25 | 1.14 | 2.90 | |
| Sample | MoC-laurdan | ||||||||||||
| 20°C | 50°C | ||||||||||||
| χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | ||
| DPPC | 1.49 | 85 | 5.46 | 15 | 2.29 | 5.24 | 1.38 | 18 | 4.89 | 82 | 2.61 | 3.28 | |
| PSM | 1.50 | 42 | 3.46 | 58 | 1.82 | 2.77 | 1.72 | 68 | 3.00 | 32 | 1.06 | 2.73 | |
| BSM | 1.84 | 18 | 3.29 | 82 | 1.22 | 2.00 | 2.54 | 34 | 2.44 | 66 | 0.87 | 1.80 | |
| DPPC/chol (6:4) | 1.37 | 85 | 4.91 | 15 | 1.62 | 4.73 | 1.38 | 29 | 4.29 | 71 | 2.79 | 3.38 | |
| PSM/chol (2:1) | 2.25 | 43 | 5.09 | 57 | 1.90 | 4.03 | 1.56 | 38 | 4.10 | 62 | 1.81 | 3.14 | |
| BSM/chol (2:1) | 1.33 | 41 | 4.12 | 59 | 2.04 | 3.26 | 1.54 | 47 | 3.36 | 53 | 1.43 | 2.73 | |
| POPC/chol (2:1) | 1.59 | 80 | 3.39 | 20 | 1.22 | 3.21 | 2.01 | 60 | 2.96 | 40 | 1.54 | 2.60 | |
| DOPC/BSM/chol (1:1:1) | 1.37 | 54 | 3.74 | 46 | 1.78 | 3.17 | 1.75 | 51 | 3.18 | 49 | 1.19 | 2.66 | |
| DOPC/PSM/chol (1:1:1) | 2.12 | 62 | 3.59 | 38 | 1.50 | 3.16 | 1.77 | 53 | 3.26 | 47 | 1.93 | 2.81 | |
| DOPC/chol (2:1) | 1.55 | 73 | 3.41 | 27 | 1.89 | 3.15 | 1.95 | 72 | 3.04 | 28 | 1.69 | 2.80 | |
| DOPC | 1.53 | 71 | 3.47 | 29 | 1.44 | 3.17 | 1.70 | 79 | 3.25 | 21 | 1.50 | 3.06 | |
| POPC | 1.88 | 82 | 3.19 | 18 | 1.56 | 3.03 | 2.04 | 70 | 3.02 | 30 | 1.32 | 2.76 | |
| Sample | C-laurdan | ||||||||||||
| 20°C | 50°C | ||||||||||||
| χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | χ² | α1 (%) | τ1 (ns) | α2 (%) | τ2 (ns) | <τ> | ||
| DPPC | 1.34 | 94 | 5.08 | 6 | 1.35 | 5.02 | 2.39 | 26 | 2.90 | 74 | 1.34 | 2.01 | |
| PSM | 1.48 | 42 | 3.64 | 58 | 1.59 | 2.87 | 1.83 | 24 | 2.80 | 76 | 1.20 | 1.87 | |
| BSM | 1.62 | 42 | 3.77 | 58 | 1.61 | 2.96 | 2.35 | 35 | 2.46 | 65 | 0.93 | 1.83 | |
| DPPC/chol (6:4) | 1.66 | 85 | 4.83 | 15 | 1.12 | 4.69 | 1.67 | 73 | 3.07 | 27 | 2.33 | 2.91 | |
| PSM/chol (2:1) | 4.04 | 59 | 5.39 | 41 | 0.61 | 5.05 | 1.67 | 100 | 3.22 | - | - | 3.22 | |
| BSM/chol (2:1) | 1.34 | 83 | 4.65 | 17 | 2.49 | 4.44 | 1.47 | 75 | 2.77 | 25 | 1.39 | 2.57 | |
| POPC/chol (2:1) | 1.63 | 90 | 3.62 | 10 | 1.66 | 3.53 | 1.75 | 35 | 2.62 | 65 | 1.44 | 2.02 | |
| DOPC/BSM/chol (1:1:1) | 1.65 | 62 | 3.81 | 38 | 1.90 | 3.36 | 1.50 | 17 | 3.34 | 83 | 1.59 | 2.12 | |
| DOPC/PSM/chol (1:1:1) | 2.51 | 58 | 4.30 | 42 | 2.01 | 3.72 | 2.15 | 46 | 2.65 | 54 | 1.27 | 2.16 | |
| DOPC/chol (2:1) | 1.50 | 60 | 3.00 | 40 | 1.27 | 2.62 | 1.99 | 22 | 2.53 | 78 | 1.16 | 1.69 | |
| DOPC | 2.30 | 47 | 2.60 | 53 | 1.34 | 2.13 | 2.35 | 16 | 2.95 | 84 | 1.01 | 1.70 | |
| POPC | 2.17 | 63 | 2.54 | 37 | 1.48 | 2.26 | 2.70 | 16 | 2.65 | 84 | 1.04 | 1.56 | |
In addition to these bilayers comprised of single components, we also carried out experiments on a lipid bilayer composed of two components, which has been previously characterized as being in Ld phase at room temperature: DOPC and cholesterol with a 2:1 molar ratio 27, 40, 41. Whilst only few differences were observed on the anisotropy measurements, the GP values were clearly higher than on pure DOPC, in agreement with the well-described capacity of cholesterol to expel water molecules from the bilayer interface 42.
Probing model bilayers undergoing So to Ld transition
We then turned our interest to the characterization of the four probes in lipid bilayers in solid-like phases ( Figure 5). For bilayers made of single components, we chose either pure DPPC, which is classically used for model bilayers, or sphingomyelins, as they are major components of the microdomains observed in cells’ plasma membranes. Two sources of sphingomyelins were used, which carry acyl chains with different lengths: BSM (mostly C 18:0) and PSM (mostly C 16:0). When incorporated into a DPPC bilayer, all four probes showed a steep decrease for both GP and anisotropy when heated above the melting transition of 41°C, indicating that the four probes are equivalently sensing the phase behavior from So to Ld occurring in the bilayer, in agreement with the results found in the literature for laurdan 43. At room temperature, i.e. in a solid DPPC bilayer, the lifetimes measured for the four probes were all much longer than the ones measured in the Ld phase, ranging from 4.86 to 5.82 ns ( Table 3).
Figure 5. GP and anisotropy of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan dyes in model membrane undergoing So to Ld transition (blue color code depicting solid ordered phases at low temperature).
The same measurements performed on bilayers made of sphingomyelins gave results which proved more complicated to interpret. First, the fluorescence emission spectra measured in sphingomyelins below the melting transition showed a broader peak when compared to the spectrum obtained with DPPC ( Figure S5). As seen in Figure 5, laurdan and M-laurdan exhibited a steep fall in GP around 35°C for BSM 44, 45 and 41°C for PSM 31. By contrast, MoC-laurdan was quite insensitive to temperature transitions in both sphingomyelins, whilst C-laurdan showed a remarkable reduction of amplitude for the PSM transition. For anisotropy measurements, the steep decrease characteristic of the solid to liquid phase transition 46 was only seen for laurdan and M-laurdan, whilst MoC-laurdan did not show any significant change of anisotropy induced by the temperature, and C-laurdan only to a reduced extent.
The strong contrast between the results found with DPPC and sphingomyelins might be related to the differences in their backbone structure since both types of lipids carry phosphocholine as head groups: DPPC can only accept a single hydrogen bond while sphingomyelin possesses an additional hydrogen bond accepting group. Also, both types of sphingomyelins used here (BSM and PSM) are derived from natural sources. As such, they contain a variety of fatty acids of different chain lengths. This will greatly impact on their phase behavior, and can thus contribute to explain why the results of anisotropy measurements do not give results which are as clear-cut as with DPPC. The very weak correlation between anisotropy and temperature observed for MoC-laurdan may be a consequence of the very low values of its fluorescence lifetimes in sphingomyelins (<τ> BSM=2.00 ns, <τ> PSM=2.77 ns at 20°C) compared to DPPC (<τ> DPPC=5.24 ns at 20°C), which may in turn be due to a poor insertion of the dye into the lipid bilayer as confirmed by rotational relaxation time calculation ( Table S2).
In sphingomyelin bilayers, M-laurdan, laurdan and to a lesser extent C-laurdan exhibited the expected steep decrease in their GP, with temperature corresponding to a melting transition. The differences observed in the steepness of the curve at the melting transition, as well as in the width of the fluorescence emission spectrum, could also arise from a shallow insertion of the probes in the sphingomyelin membranes due to the repulsion between the amino groups on the sphingomyelins and the one carried by the fluorescent probes, as already proposed for laurdan 46. This effect would be reduced for M-laurdan because it has the smallest head group of the family. On the contrary, when the probes were inserted in pure BSM or PSM bilayers, it was only with laurdan and M-laurdan that the fluorescence decay exhibited a lifetime component close to 4 ns at 20°C ( Table 3). This longer lifetime, compared to MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan (values less than 3 ns), might explain the better capacity of laurdan and M-laurdan to reveal phase transitions in sphingomyelin bilayers. In fact, the longer lifetimes of M-laurdan and laurdan when those are inserted into bilayers in So phase (between 3.81 and 5.82 ns) may allow anisotropy measurements to provide information about the order parameter of the membrane, since it would be long enough to unravel the frozen state of So phase, as does the diphenylhexatriene DPH with a fluorescence lifetime around 8–10 ns 47.
Probing model bilayers in Lo states
Next, we performed experiments on bilayers formed with DPPC/cholesterol (6:4), a standard mix used to produce lipid bilayers in pure Lo phase 48, 49. As expected with this model system, no significant differences of GP or anisotropy characteristic of phase transitions was seen with any of the four as of temperature ( Figure 6).
Figure 6. GP and anisotropy of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan dyes in model membrane in Lo phase (green, blue/green and red/green color codes depicting liquid ordered and mixed phases).
We then prepared the very similar lipid mix as the one used by Kim et al. 15, i.e. DOPC/sphingomyelin/cholesterol (1:1:1), using either BSM or PSM, and confirmed their results showing intermediary values for GP, compared to pure So and Ld phases. Our interpretation, however, differs from theirs. Indeed, we believe that the resulting emission spectrum and the corresponding GP values could simply correspond to a juxtaposition of Ld phases, enriched in DOPC, and Lo phases, enriched in sphingomyelin and cholesterol, ( Figure 4 and Figure 6, Figure S5). Similar intermediary values were obtained in POPC/cholesterol (2:1) bilayers, in which Lo and Ld phases are known to coexist. In addition, intermediary values were also found for anisotropy. Furthermore, the interpretation that this mixture, DOPC/sphingomyelin/cholesterol (1:1:1) contains both Lo and Ld phases is in good agreement with previous publications 37.
In line with a hypothesis formulated by one of us 50 that solid docks could contribute to the formation of membrane microdomains 51, we were interested in measuring whether these probes could discriminate Lo from So phase when both phases were coexisting. For all four probes, coexistence of Lo and So phases in a sphingomyelin/cholesterol bilayer led to the disappearance of the phase transition observed in bilayers made of just sphingomyelin and analyzed using GP. Similar effects were observed by anisotropy. Altogether there thus does not seem to be one particular criterion for any of the four probes which would allow the clear-cut discrimination between So and Lo phases, especially in a biological membrane containing high levels of sphingolipids and cholesterol such as the plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells.
Correlating GP/relaxation time to identify lipid phases
When a lipid bilayer goes from fluid to solid, both GP and relaxation time are expected to increase, but those two measurements actually reflect very different characteristics: whilst GP values are mostly influenced by the hydration of the environment, relaxation time reflects on the order parameter of the bilayer related to fluidity. When GP is plotted as a function of relaxation time for measurements made at room temperature on various model membranes ( Figure 7 and supporting information table S2), we find that M-laurdan is the only probe for which there is a reasonable correlation with the expected physical state of the bilayers, i.e. for which the bilayers made of just sphingomyelin (BSM or PSM), which are expected to be in solid state, do not give unexpectedly low values of GP and/or relaxation time. We perceive that this type of phenomenon could be due to the probes being excluded from the crystalline mesh of solid phases. The probes would consequently accumulate in the relatively disorganized environment corresponding to cracks and imperfections that form between tiles of truly organized lipids. In contrast with studies performed with F2N8, another polarity dye 27, our data suggest that, when measured with M-laurdan, hydration and fluidity are changing in a correlated manner in all the bilayer compositions tested, including pure sphingomyelins (BSM and PSM) measures falling close to those of DPPC. This result might come from an optimum location of the M-laurdan when inserted into the lipid bilayer as compared to laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan, for which the carbonyl function present in sphingosine may interact with the polar heads of the probes, with possible formation of hydrogen bond between the probe and the hydroxyl residue or the amide linkage carried by the sphingosine 20. As a result, we think that the simultaneous measurement of GP and relaxation time with M-laurdan used as a probe will permit a true identification of the lipid phases.
Figure 7. Correlation graphs between GP and relaxation time for laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan in various model membranes at room temperature (color codes reported from Figure 2– Figure 4).

Experiments were performed twice and reported values are mean ± SD (unseen error bars are below the size of symbols). Superimposed lanes are linear regressions and 95% confidence bands. The correlation coefficient is the best for M-laurdan (0.83), good for C-laurdan (0.79) and MoC-laurdan (0.75) and moderate for laurdan (0.57). Beyond the coefficient of correlation, M-laurdan is the only probe for which pure sphingomyelins (BSM and PSM) are measured close to DPPC, reporting most accurately for bilayers in solid order phase at room temperature.
Labelling of live cells
Next, we compared the capacity of all four probes to label live cells. First, we used flow cytometry to determine the speed at which the probes became incorporated into COS7 cells, as well as the speed at which the probes came out of the cells after staining was completed ( Figure 3B-Right panel). As expected from what we had found with liposomes, staining with C-laurdan was much faster than with the other three probes, with maximum levels attained after just 20 minutes, while staining with the other probes was still increasing steadily after 40 minutes. The reverse was true, however, when it came to the stability of the staining, with the C-laurdan staining decreasing much more rapidly than for the other three probes. Of note, similar results were obtained when the probes were used to stain either HEK or Jurkat cells, and live gating with propidium iodide did not reveal any particular toxicity on any of the three cell types (unpublished data).
To perform microscopy, we then used the probes to label COS7 cells adhered to glass coverslips, and labelled them as described in Materials and Methods. The coverslips were then placed at 37°C in the thermostatic chamber of a LSM 710 microscope, equipped for two-photon excitation. Using the spectral capacity of the microscope, the intensity images were recorded in one pass from 420 to 600 nm with 10 nm steps. Images recorded at 440 and 490 nm were used to calculate GP maps ( Figure S6). As shown in Figure 8, all four probes resulted in clear labelling of the cells, albeit with remarkably different patterns. With laurdan, the staining was predominantly present in intra-cytoplasmic vesicles. We suspect that those vesicles, which have high GP values, most probably belong to the endosome/lysosome compartment. Of note, a similar pattern of intra-cellular vesicles was also reported by Kim et al. 15 on A431 cells. Remarkably, those vesicles were absent from the staining obtained with C-laurdan, which showed a much more diffuse staining pattern, apart from a strong para-nuclear signal of low GP value which probably corresponds to the staining of the endoplasmic reticulum. Both the high GP vesicles and the low GP para-nuclear signal were present in the cells stained with M-laurdan, suggesting that this probe has a more ubiquitous distribution than laurdan or C-laurdan. Staining with MoC-laurdan resulted in patterns somewhat similar to those obtained with M-laurdan, but this probe also gave many undesirable foci on the coverslips outside of cells, which we suspect correspond to precipitated probe aggregates.
Figure 8. Two-photon imaging of COS7 cells labelled with the four different probes.
Upper row: transmission (Trans.); middle row: total fluorescence (Fluo.) from 420 to 600 nm; bottom row: GP calculated with the values from 10 nm channels centered on 440 and 490 nm (scale bar, 20 µm).
One feature which is common to all four probes is that the plasma membranes always show higher GP values than the intra-cellular compartments, which is in good agreement with the higher cholesterol content of the plasma membrane.
Dataset 1: This dataset contains the raw data of spectroscopic properties in solvents. Measurement of spectroscopic properties, quantum yield (phi), lifetime (tau) and Generalized Polarization (GP, performed twice, reported values mean ± SD) of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan in various solvents (chloroform, dichloromethane, acetone, acetonitrile, dimethylformamide, ethanol, methanol). Dataset 2: This dataset contains GP and anisotropy measurements for laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan recorded in various model membranes at room temperature (experiments were performed twice and data report for mean ± SD).
Dataset 3: Generalized polarization and relaxation time
Conclusion
We have developed a simplified approach for the easy and efficient synthesis of 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoyl naphthalene, the synthesis precursor of laurdan and C-laurdan as well as two new fluorophores, M-laurdan and MoC-laurdan. The measurements of the photophysical parameters performed on those four fluorophores solubilized in solvents showed that, for all of them, hydration has a higher impact than dielectric constant of the solvent. By combining GP and anisotropy measurements on the same model bilayers, we could simultaneously retrieve information related to the hydration level at the interface of the bilayer and to the rotational constraints of the probes. As already reported 27, we found that the presence of cholesterol results in reduced hydration of the bilayers, while the presence of sphingomyelin induces both an increase of GP, suggesting an increased hydration in the probes’ environment or extra H-bonding, and an increase of their apparent rotational mobility. This feature is particularly important given that sphingolipids comprise roughly 30% of the lipids in the plasma membranes of eukaryotes 52, and they play a critical role in the formation of lipid domains. In our data, M-laurdan, gave results which were best in agreement with the phases expected from the literature independently of the chemical nature of the lipids and of the fluorescence techniques in use. When used to label live cells, M-laurdan was also the probe which gave the most ubiquitous staining patterns, together with a good stability of the staining over time. M-laurdan thus appears as a promising tool for exploring lipid phases and order in biological membranes.
Data availability
figshare: Data of M-laurdan characterization to explore order in lipid membranes, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1109901 53
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Diana Ciuculescu-Pradines (LCC Toulouse, 205 route de Narbonne) for her help providing secure conditions for sensitive chemical reactions, and to Laurence Salomé for her guidance and useful comments. The authors thank the core IPBS facilities, NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy TRI (“Toulouse Réseau Imagerie”, Toulouse, France).
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
v2; ref status: indexed
Supplementary material
Synthesis of laurdan family products
2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoylnaphthalene: Condensation of Naphtol-2 with Lauroyl chloride in presence of tri-ethanol-amine gave naphtyl-laurate with a yield of almost 100% and the crude product was analyzed by thin layer chromatography and 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3). δ = 7.90 (dd, J=1.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.85 (dd, J=9.0, 3.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (d, J=1.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.52 (qd, J=9.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.35 (dd, J=9.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.65 (t, 2 H), 1.7 (quin, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.35 (m, 16 H), 0.88 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3 H). Then, a Fries rearrangement was carried out with anhydrous methane sulfonic acid as solvent and reactant (Journal of Molecular Catalysis A : chemical 182–183 (2002) p. 137–141 “Fries rearrangement in methane sulfonic acid an environmental friendly acid” A. Commarieu, W Hoelderich, J. A; Laffitte, M-P Dupont). The naphtyl-laurate obtained previously (0.073 mol) and anhydrous acid methane sulfonic (1.98 mol, 27 equiv.) were mixed in a 250 ml three-necked flask, equipped with a cooler and stirrer. The system was flushed with nitrogen and heated at 90°C for 1 h. The medium turned red. After cooling at room temperature, 125 g dichloromethane was added and the mixture was then poured in a container placed on crushed ice. After stirring for 1 h, the organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase extracted with 200 g of dichloromethane. The organic phases were combined and dried on magnesium sulfate. Dichloromethane was evaporated, resulting in a crude product which was analyzed by thin layer chromatography and 1H NMR. (500 MHz, CDCl 3): δ = 8.42 (s, 1 H), 8.03 (dd, J=9.0, 3.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.90 (dd, J=1.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.72 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.20 (s, 2 H), 6.35 (dd, J=9.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.1 (t, 2 H), 1.7 (quin, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.39 (m, 16 H), 0.91 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3 H). This analysis revealed that the rearrangement of naphtyl-laurate in 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoy-napahthalene was also carried out with a yield of almost 100%.
Laurdan: di MeNH•HCl (11.0 g, 0.13 mol) was added to a mixture of 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoylnaphthalene (8.0 g, 26 mmol), Na 2S 2O 5 (12 g, 61 mmol), NaOH (5.2 g, 0.13 mol), and H 2O (100 ml) in a pressure tube and the mixture was stirred at 140°C for 48 h. The product was collected by filtration, washed with water and purified by crystallization from CH 2Cl 2/EtOH; yield 5.8 g (69%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3): δ = 8.35 (s, 1 H), 7.96 (dd, J=9.1, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.73 (d, J=9.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.68 (d, J=9.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.93 (dd, J=9.1, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.77 (s, 1 H), 3.03 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.97 (s, 6 H), 1.77 (quin, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.26 (m, 16 H), 0.88 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3 H).
M-laurdan: MeNH 2•HCl (9.0 g, 0.13 mol) was added to a mixture of 2-hydroxy-6-dodecanoylnaphthalene (8.0 g, 26 mmol), Na 2S 2O 5 (12 g, 61 mmol), NaOH (5.2 g, 0.13 mol), and H 2O (100 ml) in a pressure tube and the mixture was stirred at 140°C for 48 h. The product was collected by filtration, washed with water and purified by crystallization from CH 2Cl 2/EtOH; yield 5.6 g (67%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3): δ = 8.33 (s, 1 H), 7.95 (dd, J=9.1, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.74 (d, J=9.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.66 (d, J=9.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (s, 1 H), 6.91 (dd, J=9.1, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.77 (s, 1 H), 3.03 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.97 (s, 3H), 1.77 (quin, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.26 (m, 16 H), 0.88 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3 H).
C-laurdan: A mixture of 6-dodecanoyl-2-(methylamino) naphthalene (3.0 g, 8.8 mmol), methyl bromoacetate (2.0 g, 13 mmol), Na 2HPO 4 (1.9 g, 13 mmol) and NaI (0.5 g, 3.5 mmol) in MeCN (50 ml) was refluxed under N 2 for 18 h. The product was extracted with ethyl acetate, washed with brine and purified by crystallization from EtOH to obtain a light yellow powder; yield 2.5 g (70%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3): δ = 8.35 (s, 1 H), 7.93 (dd, J=9.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.82 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.68 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.08 (dd, J=9.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.83 (s, 1 H), 4.23 (s, 2 H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.24 (s, 3 H), 3.04 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.77 (quin, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.28 (m, 16 H), 0.89 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3 H); A mixture of this intermediate (2.0 g, 4.9 mmol) and KOH (0.70 g, 12 mmol) in EtOH (50 ml) was stirred for 5 h. The resultant solution was diluted with ice-water (100 ml) and concentrated HCl (aq) was added slowly at <5°C until pH 3 was reached. The resulting precipitate was collected, washed with distilled water and purified by crystallization from chloroform/petroleum ether; yield 1.5 g (79%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3): δ = 12.77 (br s, 1 H), 8.46 (s, 1 H), 7.91 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.82 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.67 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.21 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.95 (s, 1 H), 4.26 (s, 2 H), 3.12 (s, 3 H), 3.05 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.68 (quin, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.29 (m, 16 H), 0.85 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3 H).
Supplemental Table S1. Bibliographic references for the composition of the bilayers used to obtain de various lipid phases.
| Composition and lipid phase
at low temperature |
Reference |
|---|---|
| DPPC (So)
DPPC/chol 6:4 (Lo) |
Vist, M. R.; Davis, J. H. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 451–464.
Zhang, J.; Cao, H.; Jing, B.; Almeida, P. F.; Regen, S. L. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 1402–1406. |
| PSM (So)
PSM/chol 2:1 (So + Lo) POPC (Ld) POPC/chol 2:1 (Lo + Ld) |
De Almeida, R. F. M.; Fedorov, A.; Prieto, M. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 2406–2416. |
| DOPC (Ld)
DOPC/chol 2:1 (Ld) |
Davis, J. H.; Clair, J. J.; Juhasz, J. Biophys. J. 2009, 96, 521–539.
Veatch, S. L.; Keller, S. L. Biophysical Journal 2003, 85, 3074–3083. M’Baye, G.; Mély, Y.; Duportail, G.; Klymchenko, A. S. Biophysical Journal 2008, 95, 1217–1225. |
| DOPC (Ld)
DOPC/chol 2:1 (Ld) DOPC/PSM/chol 1:1:1 (Lo + Ld) |
Nyholm, T. K. M.; Lindroos, D.; Westerlund, B.; Slotte, J. P. Langmuir 2011, 27,
8339–8350. |
| POPC (Ld) | Ionova, I. V.; Livshits, V. A.; Marsh, D. Biophysical Journal 2012, 102, 1856–1865. |
| BSM (So) | Meyer, H. W.; Bunjes, H.; Ulrich, A. S. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1999, 99, 111–123.
Pokorny, A.; Yandek, L. E.; Elegbede, A. I.; Hinderliter, A.; Almeida, P. F. F. Biophysical Journal 2006, 91, 2184–2197. |
Supplemental Table S2. Rotational relaxation time ρ (ns) of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan at 20°C.
Anisotropy values (r) were converted into rotational relaxation time (ρ) taking into account the average lifetime (τ) of the probes using the following equation: , [G. Weber, Adv. Prot. Res. 1953, 8, 415], where r 0 is the intrinsic anisotropy (set to the theoretical maximal value of 0.4 for calculations).
| Sample | laurdan | M-laurdan | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | τ (ns) | ρ (ns) | r | τ (ns) | ρ (ns) | |||
| DPPC | 0.26 | 5.82 | 33.13 | 0.27 | 4.86 | 30.30 | ||
| PSM | 0.23 | 4.28 | 18.27 | 0.27 | 4.06 | 25.01 | ||
| BSM | 0.20 | 3.82 | 11.69 | 0.24 | 3.81 | 17.25 | ||
| DPPC/chol (6:4) | 0.25 | 5.41 | 25.87 | 0.26 | 4.45 | 25.70 | ||
| PSM/chol (2:1) | 0.24 | 5.34 | 22.96 | 0.26 | 4.36 | 23.68 | ||
| BSM/chol (2:1) | 0.23 | 4.61 | 18.27 | 0.24 | 4.29 | 20.20 | ||
| POPC/chol (2:1) | 0.21 | 4.35 | 14.01 | 0.22 | 3.98 | 14.71 | ||
| DOPC/BSM/chol (1:1:1) | 0.19 | 4.36 | 12.11 | 0.21 | 4.06 | 12.82 | ||
| DOPC/PSM/chol (1:1:1) | 0.19 | 4.30 | 11.41 | 0.23 | 3.85 | 15.05 | ||
| DOPC/chol (2:1) | 0.18 | 3.75 | 9.48 | 0.19 | 3.81 | 10.00 | ||
| DOPC | 0.18 | 3.04 | 7.40 | 0.18 | 3.33 | 8.01 | ||
| POPC | 0.16 | 3.19 | 6.09 | 0.17 | 3.16 | 6.81 | ||
| Sample | MoC-laurdan | C-laurdan | ||||||
| r | τ (ns) | ρ (ns) | r | τ (ns) | ρ (ns) | |||
| DPPC | 0.22 | 5.24 | 20.07 | 0.26 | 5.02 | 29.23 | ||
| PSM | 0.15 | 2.77 | 4.98 | 0.27 | 2.87 | 17.45 | ||
| BSM | 0.11 | 2.00 | 2.35 | 0.22 | 2.96 | 10.70 | ||
| DPPC/chol (6:4) | 0.22 | 4.73 | 16.75 | 0.26 | 4.69 | 26.31 | ||
| PSM/chol (2:1) | 0.18 | 4.03 | 10.34 | 0.26 | 5.05 | 27.84 | ||
| BSM/chol (2:1) | 0.17 | 3.26 | 6.88 | 0.25 | 4.44 | 21.46 | ||
| POPC/chol (2:1) | 0.16 | 3.21 | 6.27 | 0.23 | 3.53 | 14.46 | ||
| DOPC/BSM/chol (1:1:1) | 0.14 | 3.17 | 5.05 | 0.22 | 3.36 | 12.79 | ||
| DOPC/PSM/chol (1:1:1) | 0.15 | 3.16 | 5.94 | 0.24 | 3.72 | 17.38 | ||
| DOPC/chol (2:1) | 0.14 | 3.15 | 4.88 | 0.22 | 2.62 | 9.67 | ||
| DOPC | 0.13 | 3.17 | 4.83 | 0.21 | 2.13 | 7.42 | ||
| POPC | 0.11 | 3.03 | 3.51 | 0.21 | 2.26 | 7.58 | ||
Supplemental Figure S1. Photophysical characteristics in dioxane/water mixtures.

Spectroscopic properties of the four probes in dioxane/water mixtures covering a dielectric constant range from 2 to 60. Quantum yields and mean lifetimes were measured. Deexcitation constants k r (Δ), k nr (▲) and Generalized Polarization GP were calculated.
Supplemental Figure S2. We built the Lippert plots of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan in alcohols (butanol-1, propanol-1, ethanol and methanol).
The Lipper plots shows the Stokes shift ( – ) versus the orientation polarizability (Δf) and therefore gives an estimation of the fluorophores solvent sensitivity. The linearity of the laurdan family curves can be interpreted as a general solvent effect in the spectral shift. Besides, the similarity in the slopes obtained for the different curves drives us to conclude that the different dyes are similarly sensitive to solvent polarity.
Supplemental Figure S3. Fluorescence emission in water.

Left panel: For all four dyes, the volumes of chloroform stock solutions corresponding to 3 nanomoles were dried in test tubes under nitrogen, followed by further evaporation with a vacuum pump for 2 hours. Water (3 ml) was added to each sample (final theoretical concentration: 1 µM), which were vortexed for 30 seconds at room temperature and emission spectra were then measured with a FLSP920 (Edinburgh Instruments, Scotland) fluorimeter with excitation set to 360 nm.
Right panel: Dyes were dissolved in DMSO to obtain stock solutions of 1 mM. 3 microliters from those DMSO stock solutions were injected in 3 ml of water (final concentration of 1 µM). Emission spectra were then measured with a FLSP920 (Edinburgh Instruments, Scotland) fluorimeter.
The very small peak at 410 nm corresponds to the Raman of water, as a consequence of the excitation set to 360 nm.
Supplemental Figure S4. Comparison of GP and anisotropy experiments on LUVS labeled either by direct mixing of lipids and dyes or by the DMSO loading method.
LUVs made of DPPC, DPPC/chol (6:4) and POPC (100 µM, sample volume 3 ml) were either prepared in presence of each of the four dyes laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan, or unlabeled LUVs were loaded with the dyes dissolved in DMSO. The final dye concentrations were 1 µM and the DMSO/water ratio 1:1000. GP and anisotropy were recorded as a function of temperature. Symbols: blue for DPPC, green for DPPC/chol (6:4) and red for POPC, filled symbols for LUVs prepared in presence of dyes and open symbol for DMSO loading method. As can be seen from the graphs, the two procedures used to label liposomes with dyes gave extremely similar results.
Supplemental Figure S5. Normalized emission spectra of dyes in solvents and lipid vesicles for So, Lo and Ld phases.

Upper panels show normalized emission spectra of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan in chloroform, Dimethylformamide, ethanol and water (when detectable, i.e. only for Moc-laurdan and C-laurdan). The blue shift seen for the emission spectrum for MoC-laurdan in water is attributed to the fluorescence of non hydrated aggregates, whereas C-laurdan which is highly soluble in water undergoes the expected red shift.
Lower panels show emission spectra of laurdan, M-laurdan, MoC-laurdan and C-laurdan in LUVs made of DPPC (So, blue), DOPC/PSM/chol 1:1:1 (Lo, green), DOPC/BSM/chol 1:1:1 (Lo, orange) and DOPC (Ld, red) at 25°C.
Supplemental Figure S6. Fluorescence emission spectra recorded at 440 and 490 nm using the Zeiss LSM 710 confocal spectral mode (two-photon excitation set to 720 nm).

The images are recorded in one pass on the spectra detector and used to calculate GP maps (scale bar, 20 µm).
References
- 1.Lingwood D, Simons K: Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle.(New York N.Y). Science. 2010;327(5961):46–50. 10.1126/science.1174621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Simons K, Sampaio JL: Membrane organization and lipid rafts. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(10):a004697. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown DA, London E: Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14,111–136. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sezgin E, Kaiser HJ, Baumgart T, et al. : Elucidating membrane structure and protein behavior using giant plasma membrane vesicles. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(6):1042–1051. 10.1038/nprot.2012.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chachaty C, Rainteau D, Tessier C, et al. : Building up of the liquid-ordered phase formed by sphingomyelin and cholesterol. Biophys J. 2005;88(6):4032–4044. 10.1529/biophysj.104.054155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lagerholm BC, Weinreb GE, Jacobson K, et al. : Detecting microdomains in intact cell membranes. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2005;56:309–336. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Owen DM, Rentero C, Magenau A, et al. : Quantitative imaging of membrane lipid order in cells and organisms. Nat Protoc. 2011;7(1):24–35. 10.1038/nprot.2011.419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Demchenko AP, Mély Y, Duportail G, et al. : Monitoring biophysical properties of lipid membranes by environment-sensitive fluorescent probes. Biophys J. 2009;96(9):3461–3470. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sengupta P, Hammond A, Holowka D, et al. : Structural determinants for partitioning of lipids and proteins between coexisting fluid phases in giant plasma membrane vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(1):20–32. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.08.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mazères S, Schram V, Tocanne JF, et al. : 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4-yl-labeled phospholipids in lipid membranes: differences in fluorescence behavior. Biophys J. 1996;71(1):327–35. 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79228-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baumgart T, Hunt G, Farkas ER, et al. : Fluorescence probe partitioning between Lo/Ld phases in lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768(9):2182–2194. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Juhasz J, Davis JH, Sharom FJ: Fluorescent probe partitioning in GUVs of binary phospholipid mixtures: implications for interpreting phase behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1818(1):19–26. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morales-Penningston NF, Wu J, Farkas ER, et al. : GUV preparation and imaging: minimizing artifacts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1798(7):1324–1332. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weber G, Farris FJ: Synthesis and spectral properties of a hydrophobic fluorescent probe: 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene. Biochemistry. 1979;18(14):3075–3078. 10.1021/bi00581a025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim HM, Choo HJ, Jung SY, et al. : A two-photon fluorescent probe for lipid raft imaging: C-laurdan. Chembiochem. 2007;8(5):553–559. 10.1002/cbic.200700003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kucherak OA, Oncul S, Darwich Z, et al. : Switchable nile red-based probe for cholesterol and lipid order at the outer leaflet of biomembranes. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(13):4907–4916. 10.1021/ja100351w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Obaid AL, Loew LM, Wuskell JP, et al. : Novel naphthylstyryl-pyridium potentiometric dyes offer advantages for neural network analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(2):179–190. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pivovarenko VG, Zamotaiev OM, Shvadchak VV, et al. : Quantification of local hydration at the surface of biomolecules using dual-fluorescence labels. J Phys Chem A. 2012;116(12):3103–3109. 10.1021/jp2101732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pérochon E, Lopez A, Tocanne JF: Polarity of lipid bilayers. A fluorescence investigation. Biochemistry. 1992;31(33):7672–7682. 10.1021/bi00148a031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bagatolli LA, Parasassi T, Fidelio GD, et al. : A model for the interaction of 6-lauroyl-2-(N,N-dimethylamino)naphthalene with lipid environments: implications for spectral properties. Photochem Photobiol. 1999;70(4):557–564. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb08251.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kozyra KA, Heldt JR, Heldt J, et al. : Concentration and temperature dependence of Laurdan fluorescence in glycerol.Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. A A J Phys Sci. 2003;58(9–10):581–588 Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 22.Viard M, Gallay J, Vincent M, et al. : Laurdan solvatochromism: solvent dielectric relaxation and intramolecular excited-state reaction. Biophys J. 1997;73(4):2221–2234. 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78253-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Catalan J, Perez P, Laynez J, et al. : Analysis of the solvent effect on the photophysics properties of 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene (PRODAN). J Fluoresc. 1991;1(4):215–223. 10.1007/BF00865246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Parisio G, Ferrarini A: Solute Partitioning into Lipid Bilayers: An Implicit Model for Nonuniform and Ordered Environment. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6(8):2267–2280 10.1021/ct100210u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parisio G, Marini A, Biancardi A, et al. : Polarity-sensitive fluorescent probes in lipid bilayers: bridging spectroscopic behavior and microenvironment properties. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115(33):9980–9989. 10.1021/jp205163w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barucha-Kraszewska J, Kraszewski S, Ramseyer C: Will C-Laurdan dethrone Laurdan in fluorescent solvent relaxation techniques for lipid membrane studies? Langmuir. 2013;29(4):1174–1182. 10.1021/la304235r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.M’Baye G, Mély Y, Duportail G, et al. : Liquid ordered and gel phases of lipid bilayers: fluorescent probes reveal close fluidity but different hydration. Biophys J. 2008;95(3):1217–1225. 10.1529/biophysj.107.127480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Molotsky T, Huppert D: Solvation Statics and Dynamics of Coumarin 153 in Dioxane−Water Solvent Mixtures. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107(41):8449–8457 10.1021/jp034760i [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lakowicz JR: Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Springer. 2006. 10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mazères S, Lagane B, Welby M, et al. : Probing the lateral organization of membranes: fluorescence repercussions of pyrene probe distribution. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2001;57(11):2297–2311. 10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00486-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Almeida RF, Fedorov A, Prieto M: Sphingomyelin/phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol phase diagram: boundaries and composition of lipid rafts. Biophys J. 2003;85(4),2406–2416. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74664-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Valeur B: Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications. Wiley; Consulté à l’adresse.2001. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parasassi T, De Stasio G, Ravagnan G, et al. : Quantitation of lipid phases in phospholipid vesicles by the generalized polarization of Laurdan fluorescence. Biophys J. 1991;60(1):179–189. 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82041-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Commarieu A, Hoelderich W, Laffitte JA, et al. : Fries rearrangement in methane sulfonic acid, an environmental friendly acid. J Molecular Catalysis A: Chem. 2002;182–183(0):137–141 10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00506-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bagatolli LA: To see or not to see: lateral organization of biological membranes and fluorescence microscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758(10):1541–1556. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Owen DM, Rentero C, Magenau A, et al. : Quantitative imaging of membrane lipid order in cells and organisms. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(1):24–35. 10.1038/nprot.2011.419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dietrich C, Bagatolli LA, Volovyk ZN: Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys J. 2001;80(3):1417–1428. 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76114-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ionova IV, Livshits VA, Marsh D: Phase diagram of ternary cholesterol/palmitoylsphingomyelin/palmitoyloleoyl-phosphatidylcholine mixtures: spin-label EPR study of lipid-raft formation. Biophys J. 2012;102(8):1856–1865. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nyholm TK, Lindroos D, Westerlund B, et al. : Construction of a DOPC/PSM/cholesterol phase diagram based on the fluorescence properties of trans-parinaric acid. Langmuir. 2011;27(13):8339–8350. 10.1021/la201427w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Davis JH, Clair JJ, Juhasz J: Phase equilibria in DOPC/DPPC-d62/cholesterol mixtures. Biophys J. 2009;96(2):521–539. 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Veatch SL, Keller SL: Separation of liquid phases in giant vesicles of ternary mixtures of phospholipids and cholesterol. Biophys J. 2003;85(5):3074–3083. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Parasassi T, Di Stefano M, Loiero M, et al. : Influence of cholesterol on phospholipid bilayers phase domains as detected by Laurdan fluorescence. Biophys J. 1994;66(1):120–132. 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80763-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Harris FM, Best KB, Bell JD: Use of laurdan fluorescence intensity and polarization to distinguish between changes in membrane fluidity and phospholipid order. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1565(1):123–128. 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00514-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Meyer HW, Bunjes H, Ulrich AS: Morphological transitions of brain sphingomyelin are determined by the hydration protocol: ripples re-arrange in plane, and sponge-like networks disintegrate into small vesicles. Chem Phys Lipids. 1999;99(2):111–123. 10.1016/S0009-3084(99)00029-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pokorny A, Yandek LE, Elegbede AI, et al. : Temperature and composition dependence of the interaction of δ-lysin with ternary mixtures of sphingomyelin/cholesterol/POPC. Biophys J. 2006;91(6):2184–2197. 10.1529/biophysj.106.085027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nyholm T, Nylund M, Söderholm A, et al. : Properties of palmitoyl phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, and dihydrosphingomyelin bilayer membranes as reported by different fluorescent reporter molecules. Biophys J. 2003;84(2):987–997. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74915-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van der Heide UA, van Ginkel G, Levine YK: DPH is localised in two distinct populations in lipid vesicles. Chem Phys Lett. 1996;253(1–2):118–122 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00212-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vist MR, Davis JH: Phase equilibria of cholesterol/dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine mixtures: 2H nuclear magnetic resonance and differential scanning calorimetry. Biochemistry. 1990;29(2):451–464. 10.1021/bi00454a021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang J, Cao H, Jing B, et al. : Cholesterol-phospholipid association in fluid bilayers: a thermodynamic analysis from nearest-neighbor recognition measurements. Biophys J. 2006;91(4):1402–1406. 10.1529/biophysj.106.084152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Joly E: Hypothesis: could the signalling function of membrane microdomains involve a localized transition of lipids from liquid to solid state? BMC Cell Biol. 2004;5:3. 10.1186/1471-2121-5-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Almeida RF, Joly E: Crystallization around solid-like nanosized docks can explain the specificity, diversity, and stability of membrane microdomains. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:72). 10.3389/fpls.2014.00072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW: Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(2):112–124. 10.1038/nrm2330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mazères S, Joly E, Lopez A, et al. : Data of M-laurdan characterization to explore order in lipid membranes. figshare. 2014. Data Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]









