Table 2.

Predictors of sustainment, measures, and data collection methods

Construct	Dimension	Measurement source	Data collection methods	Respondent(s)
Community/environment factors
External support	▪ Funding for intervention-related services	Knudsen 2009 [53]	Interview & Survey	Supervisor
Community participation	▪ Intervention-relevant referrals	Knudsen 2009 [53]	Survey & Interview	Supervisor
	▪ Dissemination efforts and community involvement	Scheirer et al. 2008 [17]
Implementation during the funding period-related factors
Quantity and quality	▪ # of clients served, # of clinicians certified, # of supervisors certified, average # of sessions provided per participant	Archival data	NA	NA
Client outcomes	▪ 12-month recovery status	Archival data	NA	NA
Organizational factors
Organizational type and capacities	▪ Agency type, services offered, payment sources, age of program, client size and composition	N-SSATS [44]; Knudsen 2009 [53]	Interview & Survey	Supervisor
				Supervisor
	▪ Staff levels & qualifications	Knudsen 2009 [53]	Survey	Supervisor
	▪ Staff turnover (annual rates, key personnel)		Survey
	▪ Sustainability capacity	Wash U, 2012 [55]	Survey	Supervisor
Leadership support	▪ Managerial support for EBT	O’Loughlin et al. 1998 [26]; Aarons et al., 2013 [54];	Survey & Interview	Clinician
	▪ EBT champion(s)			Clinician
		O’Loughlin et al. 1998 [26]
Organizational Readiness to Change	▪ Motivation to change, resources, staff attributes, organizational climate	Lehman et al. 2002 [35]	Survey	Clinician
Intervention characteristics
EBT perceptions	▪ Perceptions of the EBT intervention (a)	(a) Steckler et al. 1992 [56]; O’Loughlin et al. 1998 [26]	(a) Interview & Survey	Clinician (a)
	▪ Attitudes toward the EBT intervention (b)			Supervisor & Clinician (b, c, d)
	▪ Plans for EBT sustainment or spread (c)	(b) Lin et al. 2005 [57]; O’Loughlin et al. 1998 [26]	(b) Interview & Survey
	▪ Perceived implementation facilitators and challenges (d)	(c & d) Scheirer et al. 2008 [17]	(c & d) Interview