Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 21;78(3):619–629. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12336

Table 4.

Relative risk of hepatotoxicity associated with individual MMI or CBM compared with PTU

Events/PTU users Events/MMI users Events/CBM users MMI vs. PTU CBM vs. PTU
Adjusted HR (95% CI)* Adjusted HR (95% CI)*
Hepatitis 21/24 941 107/34 361 11/12 077 3.54 (2.21, 5.65) 1.04 (0.50, 2.16)
Acute liver failure 12/24 941 9/34 361 3/12 077 0.55 (0.23, 1.32) 0.53 (0.15, 1.88)
Cholestasis 4/24 941 6/34 361 3/12 077 1.04 (0.29, 3.72) 1.41 (0.31, 6.33)

CBM, carbimazole; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MMI, methimazole; PTU, propylthiouracil.

*

Adjusted for all variables listed in Table 1, with the exceptions of history of hyperthyroidism, hyperlipidaemia and use of neurological drugs for the outcome of acute liver failure as well as presence of pregnancy and chronic kidney diseases for the cholestasis outcome due to small sample size.

The censorship of switch between use of MMI and CBM was considered during analyses of hepatotoxicity risk from individual MMI or CBM.

P < 0.05.