Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113836

Table 1. The survey and effort data and the estimated proportion of seals from the total population in each sub-area.

Trap nets Gill nets proportion of seals
sub-area by-catch in sample effort in sample (gear-days) total effort (gear-days) by-catch in sample effort in sample (km-days) total effort (km-days) number of interviews expected (%) spring (%) fall (%)
E1 104 2458 11772 34 6.25 7.5 5
E2 59 1542 8722 25 6.25 7.5 5
E3 10 1096 3135 13 1.75 0.5 3
F1 45 23533 36636 25 1.75 0.5 3
F2 5 3823 58863 10 30 35 25
F3 0 0 5057 0 2 0 4
S1 0 0 8515 20 1402 7904 13 22.5 25 20
S2 61 2450 2563 35 1540 1611 41 16.5 15 18
S3 0 0 4806 0 2 0 4
total 284 34902 140069 55 2942 9515 161 89 91 87

Empty gill net cells represent areas where we assume gill nets do not contribute to by-catch.