Table 1. The survey and effort data and the estimated proportion of seals from the total population in each sub-area.
Trap nets | Gill nets | proportion of seals | ||||||||
sub-area | by-catch in sample | effort in sample (gear-days) | total effort (gear-days) | by-catch in sample | effort in sample (km-days) | total effort (km-days) | number of interviews | expected (%) | spring (%) | fall (%) |
E1 | 104 | 2458 | 11772 | 34 | 6.25 | 7.5 | 5 | |||
E2 | 59 | 1542 | 8722 | 25 | 6.25 | 7.5 | 5 | |||
E3 | 10 | 1096 | 3135 | 13 | 1.75 | 0.5 | 3 | |||
F1 | 45 | 23533 | 36636 | 25 | 1.75 | 0.5 | 3 | |||
F2 | 5 | 3823 | 58863 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 25 | |||
F3 | 0 | 0 | 5057 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |||
S1 | 0 | 0 | 8515 | 20 | 1402 | 7904 | 13 | 22.5 | 25 | 20 |
S2 | 61 | 2450 | 2563 | 35 | 1540 | 1611 | 41 | 16.5 | 15 | 18 |
S3 | 0 | 0 | 4806 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |||
total | 284 | 34902 | 140069 | 55 | 2942 | 9515 | 161 | 89 | 91 | 87 |
Empty gill net cells represent areas where we assume gill nets do not contribute to by-catch.