Table 2. The effects of price regulation in the form , i.e. the price is set 40% lower than the optimal monopolistic price.

(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
h	P*
0.10	0.97	0.0069	5.98	0.0581	24.38	8.37	56.71
0.20	0.93	0.0061	5.70	0.0534	23.73	8.79	57.16
0.30	0.88	0.0052	5.42	0.0484	23.04	9.25	57.64
0.40	0.82	0.0044	5.13	0.0430	22.31	9.78	58.10
0.50	0.75	0.0036	4.85	0.0372	21.54	10.37	58.60
0.60	0.66	0.0028	4.55	0.0310	20.71	11.05	59.09
0.70	0.55	0.0020	4.25	0.0242	19.84	11.84	59.57
0.80	0.41	0.0013	3.95	0.0169	18.90	12.75	60.08
0.90	0.24	0.0006	3.65	0.0088	17.91	13.83	60.59

In this case the decrease in revenues is 3%–6% (see column 4), much more substantial relative to the case shown in Table 1. While the increase in consumer surplus is also larger (6), the ratio between the consumer surplus increase and the revenue decrease is lower than in the case of (compare column (7) with column (7) in Table 1).