Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2014 Oct 13;11(6):066001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/066001

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Examples across cases show variability of suppression spread. A single stimulation site in the ICD (circled in red) resulted in a suppression spread of 46.0% (a - 29 significantly suppressed sites out of 63 ICC sites shown in black, see Methods: Data Analysis for statistical methods) compared to an ICD stimulation site 500 μm away that resulted in a suppression spread of 11.1% (b - 7 of 63 ICC sites). A histogram of the suppression spread resulting from 35 stimulated ICD sites from 5 animals is shown in (c) with an average of 18.2 ± 9.5% (mean ± SD). A total of 2428 ICC sites were included in this analysis, with 456 ICC sites showing suppression.