Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 26;34(48):15870–15876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1011-14.2014

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The cueing effect and neural correlates. Pre-sleep SRTT performance across all blocks of learning in the experimental group (a) and the control group (b). c, Cues led to significantly more correctly recalled sequence items for the experimental group but not control group. d, Correlation between slow oscillation power in central electrodes and the explicit cueing effect during CUE (n = 10) in the experimental group. e, SRTT sequence-specific skill improvement was significantly better for the cued than uncued sequence in the experimental group only. f, Spindle laterality at central electrodes predicted the procedural cueing effect in the experimental group during CUE (n = 12) and NO-CUE. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Correlations are presented with some participants removed as a result of EEG artifacts.