Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 11;4(11):e005889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005889

Table 2.

Association between participants’ characteristics (sociodemographic and clinical) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity

Hepatitis B infection (HBsAg result)
Variable N (+ve) N (−ve) Per cent (+ve) Crude OR (CI) p Value
Overall prevalence 47* 350 11.8
Age (years)
 ≤20 22 88 20 2.62 (1.41 to 4.89) 0.002†
 >20 25 262 8.7 Ref
Education
 Informal 6 24 20 Ref
 Primary 17 174 8.9 0.39 (0.14 to 1.09) 0.070
 Secondary 20 120 14.3 0.67 (0.24 to 1.83) 0.432
 Tertiary 4 32 11.8 0.50 (0.13 to 1.97) 0.322
Marital status
 Not married 30 207 12.7 Reference
 Married 17 143 10.6 0.82 (0.44 to 1.54) 0.539
Parity
 0 13 80 14.0 Reference
 1–4 29 221 11.6 0.81 (0.40 to 1.63) 0.551
 5+ 5 49 9.3 0.63 (0.21 to 1.87) 0.403
HIV status
 Negative 43 317 11.94 Reference
 Positive 4 33 10.81 0.89 (0.30 to 2.65) 0.839
Scarification
 Not done 5 38 10.6 Reference
 Done 42 312 11.2 1.02 (0.38 to 2.74) 0.934
History of blood transfusion
 No 44 339 11.5 Reference
 Yes 3 11 21.43 2.10 (0.56 to 7.82 0.268
Number of sexual partners in the past 2 years
 1 43 334 11.4 Reference
 2 4 16 20.0 1.93 (0.62 to 6.08) 0.254

*Of the 47 with an HBsAg positive result, 7 (14.9%) were found hepatitis B e Antigen positive.

†At the multivariate level, only age was a significant predictor of HBsAg positivity, at aOR=2.54 (1.31 to 4.90); p value 0.006.