Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 24;4(11):e005869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005869

TableĀ 3.

Healthcare professionalsā€™ responses to 15 attitudinal statements on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, Uganda, 2013

Statement Agree Neutral Disagree
Serious ADRs are well documented by the time a drug is marketed 820 (61.7) 166 (12.5) 343 (25.8)
It is nearly impossible to determine whether a drug is responsible for a particular adverse reaction 527 (39.8) 189 (14.3) 607 (45.9)
I would only report an ADR if I were sure that it was related to the use of a particular drug 833 (63.6) 138 (10.6) 338 (25.8)
The one case of an ADR that an individual health worker might see makes no significant contribution to medical knowledge 210 (16.2) 122 (9.4) 966 (74.4)
I read articles about adverse drug reactions with interest 824 (63.3) 180 (13.8) 298 (22.9)
I have a professional obligation to report ADRs 1000 (76.3) 143 (10.9) 168 (12.8)
Reporting ADRs puts my career at risk 186 (14.3) 126 (9.7) 989 (76.0)
It is only necessary to report serious or unexpected ADRs 466 (35.7) 129 (9.9) 709 (54.4)
I do not have time to complete an ADR report form 143 (10.9) 208 (15.8) 963 (73.3)
I do not have the time to actively look for ADRs while at work 195 (14.8) 152 (11.6) 968 (73.6)
I do not know how information reported in an ADR form is used 596 (45.4) 194 (14.8) 522 (39.8)
I talk with pharmaceutical companies about possible ADRs with their drugs 290 (22.2) 202 (15.5) 813 (62.3)
I think the best way to report ADRs is by publishing in medical literature 701 (53.4) 238 (18.1) 374 (28.5)
I should be financially reimbursed for providing the ADR service 349 (26.7) 199 (15.3) 757 (58.0)
I would be more likely to report ADRs if there were an easier method 896 (67.9) 169 (12.8) 254 (19.3)