Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 15;20:2298–2310. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890696

Table 1.

Published BIA equations for the prediction of FFM in children and adolescents.

Equation number Citation Participants characteristics Equation for FFM R2 SEE (kg)
1 Bedogni et al. [23] 8–12 y (C); n=52 M/F (0.7 × H2/Z)+4.8 0.95 1.5
2 Boileau [24] 8–16 y (C); n (NR) (0.657 × H2/R) + (0.16 × W) − (0.131 × sex) + 4.138 (sex: M=1, F=1) 0.97 1.8
3 Cordain et al. [25] 9–14 y (NR); n=14 M, 16 F (0.81 × H2/R) + 6.86 0.69 4.08
4 de Lorenzo et al. [26] 7.7–13.0 (NR); n=20 M, 15 F (0.588 × H2/Z) + (0.211 × W) + 2.33 0.92 1.0
5 Deurenberg et al. [27] 7–25 y (C); n=130 M, 116 F (0.438 × H2/R) + (0.308 × W) + (1.6 × sex) + (0.07 × H) − 8.5 (sex: M=1, F=0) 0.99 2.39
6 Deurenberg et al. [28] 7–15 y (NR); n=166 M/F (0.406 × H2/R) + (0.36 × W) + (0.56 × sex) + (0.056 × H) − 6.48 (sex: M=1, F=0) 0.97 1.68
7 ≥16 y (NR); n=661 M/F (0.340 × H2/R) + (15.34 × H) + (0.273 × W) − (0.127 × age) + (4.56 × sex) − 12.44 (sex: M=1, F=0) 0.93 2.63
8 Duncan et al. [18] 5–14 (As); n=39 M, 40 F (0.533 × H2/R) + (0.329 × W) + 0.04 0.98 1.49
9 Eston et al. [17] 11–17 y (As); n=48 M, 46 F (0.52 × H2/R) + (0.28 × W) + 3.25 0.93 2.20
10 Horlick et al. [29] 4–18 y (C,AA,Af,As); n=645 M, 602 F [(0.459 × H2/R) + (0.064 × W) + 3.474]/[(0.769 − (0.009 × age) − (0.016 × sex)] (sex: M=1, F=0) 0.997 0.93
11 Houtkooper et al. [30] 10–14 y (C); n=53 M, 41 F (0.58 × H2/R) + (0.24 × W) + 2.69 0.93 2.0
12 Houtkooper et al. [31] 10–19 y (C); n=225 M/F (0.61 × H2/R) + (0.25 × W) + 1.31 0.95 2.10
13 Kim et al. [32] 9–14 y (As); n=141 M (0.56 × H2/Z) + (0.20 × W) + 1.66 0.97 1.59
14 Lewy et al. [33] M 11.4±1.4 y; F 10.2±0.4 y; n=19 M, 17 F (AA) (0.84 × H2/R) + 1.10 0.97 1.47
15 Morrison et al. [34] 6–17 y (AA); n=61 F (0.78 × H2/R) + (0.1 × X)+ (0.18 × W) − 8.78 0.99 1.95
16 6–17 y (C); n=65 F (0.56 × H2/R) + (0.06 × X) + (0.34 × W) − 6.41 0.99 NR
17 Nielsen et al. [35] 9–11 y (C); n=52 M, 49 F (0.54 × H2/R) + (0.05 × X) + (0.06 × H) + (0.09 × W) + (0.97 × sex) − 5.11 (sex: M=1, F=0) 0.95 NR
18 Pietrobelli et al. [36] 7–14 y (C); n=50 M, 25 F (0.694 × H2/Z) − (1.097 × sex) + 5.344 (sex: M=0, F=1) 0.90 5.12
19 Rush et al. [22] 5–14 y (C,P); n=83 M, 89 F (0.622 × H2/R) + (0.234 × W) + 1.166 0.96 2.44
20 Schaefer et al. [37] 3.9–19.3 y (C); n=59 M, 53 F (0.65 × H2/R) + (0.68 × age) + 0.15 0.975 1.98
21 Sun et al. [13] 12–94 y (C,As); n=669 M, 944 F (0.65 × H2/R) + (0.26 × W) + (0.02 × R) − 10.68 (sex: M) 0.90 3.9
22 (0.69 × H2/R) + (0.17 × W) + (0.02 × R) − 9.53 (sex: F) 0.83 2.9
23 Suprasongsin et al. [38] 10–22 y (C); n=21 M, 21 F (0.524 × H2/R) + (0.415 × W) − 0.32 0.96 2.8
24 Tyrrell et al. [39] 5–10.9 y (C,P); n=82 M/F (0.31 × H2/Z) + (0.17 × H) + (0.11 × W) + (0.942 × sex) − 14.96 (sex: M=2, F=1) 0.97 NR

C – Caucasian; As – Asian; AA – American African; Af – African; P – Polynesian; NR – no report; H – body height in cm; W – body weight in kg; M – male; F – female; R – resistance in Ω; Z – impedance in Ω; X – reactance in Ω. R2 – regression coefficients; SEE – standard error of estimate.