Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;11(11):11261–11285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111111261

Table 3.

School nutrition environment score characteristics of the schools that provided information on all five * selected characteristics in COSI rounds 1 (2007/2008) and 2 (2009/2010), by sampling approach and country.

Countries Number of Schools School Nutrition Environment Score
n Mean ± SD (CV (%))
Round 1 Round 2 Round 1 Round 2
Same Schools in Both Rounds
Ireland 154 153 0.71 ± 0.14 a (20.2) 0.71 ± 0.16 a (22.2)
Lithuania 155 160 0.51 ± 0.23 b (45.2) 0.52 ± 0.25 b (48.5)
Norway 126 124 0.93 ± 0.11 c (11.3) 0.92 ± 0.10 c (11.2)
Portugal § 176 167 0.79 ± 0.14 d,e (17.7) 0.90 ± 0.13 c (14.3)
New Sample of Schools in Both Rounds
Bulgaria 179 0.30 ± 0.24 f (79.3)
Czech Republic § 548 882 0.58 ± 0.21 g (35.5) 0.63 ± 0.17 d (26.6)
Greece 123 0.57 ± 0.18 b,d (31.2)
Hungary 98 0.57 ± 0.28 b,d (49.3)
Latvia 190 169 0.58 ± 0.19 b,g (32.8) 0.56 ± 0.19 b (33.8)
Malta 95 0.74 ± 0.14 a,d (18.5)
Slovenia § 116 167 0.83 ± 0.14 e,h (16.7) 0.91 ± 0.11 c (12.5)
Sweden 89 0.88 ± 0.15 c,h (16.7)

Notes: * The five selected nutrition-related school environment characteristics were: fresh fruit, milk, cold drinks containing sugar, sweet snacks or salted snacks can be obtained on the school premises; Statistically significant difference of mean scores across countries for the indicated round (one-way ANOVA; p < 0.0001); § Statistically significant difference of mean scores between the two rounds for the indicated country (unpaired t-test; p < 0.0001); a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h Within each round (i.e., by column), scores that share the same superscript letter do not statistically significantly differ from each other (Games-Howell post hoc test); –, no participation; COSI, Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative; CV, coefficient of variation; SD, standard deviation.