Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 3;111(46):16262–16267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314814111

Table 2.

Replicability analysis for FDR control for the study of ref. 17 on GWAS of T2D

Chr. Position p.primary p1 p2 p_meta r value
7 27,953,796 1.55e-04 8.07e-05 1.34e-07 4.96e-14 0.0055
10 12,368,016 4.21e-04 5.40e-05 1.49e-04 1.21e-10 0.0055
12 69,949,369 1.80e-05 9.83e-03 4.35e-05 1.11e-09 0.1490
2 43,644,474 1.83e-04 1.62e-03 9.22e-05 1.12e-09 0.0441
3 64,686,944 5.44e-04 1.02e-04 3.47e-03 1.17e-08 0.0254
1 120,230,001 1.14e-04 2.89e-03 1.95e-03 4.10e-08 0.0604
12 53,385,263 3.18e-05 3.11e-03 8.81e-03 1.79e-07 0.0604
3 12,252,845 1.05e-05 4.50e-03 1.22e-02 1.97e-07 0.0765
1 120,149,926 1.35e-03 1.17e-03 7.84e-03 4.04e-07 0.0431
6 43,919,740 5.41e-05 1.46e-03 9.49e-02 4.03e-06 0.2090
2 60,581,582 3.38e-05 1.38e-03 6.54e-01 1.02e-04 1.0000

The number of SNPs in the first follow-up study was 68, and 11 were followed up to the second follow-up study. For these 11 SNPs, the positions (columns 1 and 2), the primary study P values and first and second follow-up studies P values (columns 3–5), the metaanalysis P values from all three studies (column 6), and the r values quantifying the evidence of replicability from the first to the second follow-up study (column 7) are shown. The lower bound for f00 was l00=0 for the r-value computation, because the set of SNPs in the first follow-up study is already believed to be associated with T2D.