Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 27;111(46):16442–16447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413253111

Table 1.

Diversification estimates obtained for EFN and non-EFN clades from BAMM analyses

Whole trees Sister clades
Plant group rEFN rnonEFN Shifts/cladeEFN Shifts/cladenonEFN rEFN rnonEFN Shift/total timeEFN Shift/total timenonEFN
Byttneria 172.25 (53.3) 212.40 (105.24)
Pleopeltis 65.11 (29.56) 31.5 (9.88) 3.5 (2.45) 3 (2.16) 65.11 (21.18) 46.19 (18.59) 1.8 (0.93) 2.63 (1.36)
Polygoneae 23.66 (7.26) 33.41 (6.83) 2.5 (1.87) 5.5 (3.02) 23.66 (7.26) 39.38 (7.73) 2.08 (1.0) 1.31 (0.41)
Senna 113.54 (27.24) 50.70 (28.15) 4.6 (3.2) 1 (1) 113.54 (27.24) 67.27 (39.34) 7.02 (2.93) 30.78 (10.28)
Turnera 24.23 (6.42) 18.22 (7.22)
Viburnum 266.6 (67.92) 114.4 (43.86) 5 (3.32) 2.5 (1.87) 266.6 (67.92) 184.42 (79.34) 20.02 (7.35) 30.81 (12.79)

The mean (and SD) are reported. Sister clade comparisons were not possible for Byttneria and Turnera because of tree shape. Boldfaced numbers represent the larger of the estimates of EFN to non-EFN for each metric. EFN, EFN present; nonEFN, EFN absent; r, whole-tree net diversification rate (speciation rate − extinction rate), shifts/clade, number of rate shifts within the targeted sister clade, shift/time, number of rate shifts per total summed branch length in that targeted sister clade.