Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568–571. doi: 10.1038/nature13954

Extended Data Table 4. Predictive model and validation.

a, ROC curve analysis for clinical response based on pre-treatment CD8+, PD-1+, PD-L1+, and CD4+ cells. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to measure response prediction performance for pre-treatment CD8+, PD-1+, PD-L1+, and CD4+ cell densities (cells/mm2). P-values were computed on the basis of the Wilcoxon rank sum statistic. b, Performance of a model for clinical response using CD8+ (cells/mm2). A logistic regression model was constructed using pre-treatment CD8+ (cells/mm2) versus the outcome of clinical response (PR+SD vs PD) using the study cohort. This fixed model was then applied to the CD8+ density measurements in the validation cohort to compute predicted probabilities of response to treatment.

a
Variable AUC (95% Cl)* P-value**
Tumour
 CD8+ Density .91 (0.81, 1.00) <0.001
 PD-1+ Density .80 (0.67, 0.94) 0.001
 PD-L1+ Density .71 (0.54, 0.88) 0.026
 CD4+ Density .66 (0.48, 0.84) 0.095
Invasive Margin
 CD8+ Density .94 (0.88, 1.00) <0.001
 PD-1 + Density .80 (0.66, 0.94) 0.001
 PD-L1+ Density .79 (0.64, 0.95) 0.002
 CD4+ Density .66 (0.48, 0.84) 0.095
b
Patient ID CD8+ Density, Before Tx (Invasive Margin) Predicted Probability of Response (Logistic Model) Blinded Prediction True Clinical Response (RECIST 1.1)
IGR-A 58 0.35 Progression Progression
IGR-B 159 0.37 Progression Progression
IGR-C 329 0.40 Progression Progression
IGR-D 341 0.41 Progression Progression
IGR-E 2120 0.75 Response Stable
IGR-F 5466 0.98 Response Progression
IGR-G 2211 0.76 Response Response
IGR-H 3810 0.92 Response Response
IGR-I 4294 0.95 Response Response
IGR-J 4948 0.97 Response Response
IGR-K 5565 0.98 Response Response
IGR-L 6004 0.99 Response Response
IGR-M 5951 0.99 Response Complete Response
IGR-N 7230 0.99 Response Complete Response
IGR-O 6320 0.99 Response Complete Response