Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 1;96(3):467–477. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci199

Table 7.

Simple and partial Mantel tests of association among genetic distances, geographic distance and climatic variables of Echinacea angustifolia populations

Matrix
A
B
C
R-statistic
P*
AMT GEN −0·5323 0·0010
AMP GEN −0·4296 0·0047
FFD GEN −0·4369 0·0010
GEO GEN 0·5423 0·0010b
AMT GEO −0·9479 0·0010
AMP GEO −0·7022 0·0020
FFD GEO −0·8152 0·0001
AMT GEN GEO −0·1302 0·2238
AMP GEN GEO −0·1013 0·2767
FFD GEN GEO −0·1991 0·1139
GEN GEO AMP 0·3463 0·0170
GEN GEO AMT 0·0732 0·3047
GEN GEO FFD 0·2056 0·0769

The pattern of association in the dependent matrix A was compared with the predictor matrix B, while controlling for the effects of matrix C, using the partial Mantel test (Smouse et al., 1986).

Genetic distance was calculated using Nei and Li's (1979) estimate.

Climatic data are averaged values from the time period 1931–2000 with the exception of freeze-free days, which is from the time period 1951–1980.

AMT, annual mean temperature; AMP, annual mean precipitation; FFD, freeze-free days; GEN, genetic distance; GEO, geographic distance.

*

Probability that a random Z ≤ observed Z.

Probability that a random Z ≥ observed Z.