Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec 7;95(3):431–437. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci041

Table 3.

Flower mass in Rosmarinus as affected by habitat, site (within habitat), and individual plant

ANOVA table
Source
d.f.
MS
F
P
Habitat 2 1·503 1207·45 <0·001
Site(Habitat) 6 0·140 112·12 <0·001
Plant(Site*Habitat) 228 0·012 9·69 <0·001
Error 404 0·001
Univariate statistics
Habitat
Mean*
s.e.m.
n
Coast 17·202 a 0·275 195
Lowland 20·752 b 0·261 197
Mountain 25·047 c 0·241 249

The nested design had fresh individual flower mass (in mg, log10 transformed) as the response variable.

For the whole model, r2 = 0·931.

Univariate statistics for the three habitats are also given.

*

The letters identify means significantly different at P < 0·001 (Fisher's least significant differences test).