Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov 16;95(2):315–321. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci028

Table 1.

Summary statistics of reduced major axis regression analyses of log10-transformed data for above- and below-ground standing biomass (MA and MB; original units = kg d. wt plant−1) and annual growth rate relationships (GA and GB; original units = kg d. wt plant−1 year−1)


αPred.
αRMA ± s.e
95 % CI
Log βRMA ± s.e
95 % CI
n
r2
F
Across entire database (0·0000003 ≤ MA ≤ 2723 kg d. wt; 0·0000003 kg d. wt ≤ MR ≤ 462·5 kg d. wt)
    MB vs. MA 3/4–1 0·941 ± 0·01 0·930–0·946 −0·517 ± 0·01 −0·548 to −0·499 1406 0·974 53071
    MB vs. MS 1·0 0·924 ± 0·01 0·900–0·921 −0·386 ± 0·01 −0·391 to −0·361 878 0·975 34784
    MB vs. ML 4/3 1·172 ± 0·01 1·154–1·184 0·438 ± 0·02 0·410 to 0·484 847 0·963 21796
    GB vs. GA 1·0 0·946 ± 0·01 0·930–0·962 −0·678 ± 0·02 −0·709 to −0·647 406 0·970 12927
    GB vs. GS 1·0 0·853 ± 0·01 0·835–0·869 −0·464 ± 0·02 −0·501 to −0·427 406 0·961 10012
    GB vs. GL 1·0 0·956 ± 0·01 0·937–0·974 −0·303 ± 0·02 −0·341 to −0·264 426 0·960 10210
Across new data set (0·0000003 ≤ MA ≤ 6·70 kg d. wt; 0·0000003 kg d. wt ≤ MR ≤ 27·3 kg d. wt)
    MB vs. MA 1·0 0·955 ± 0·01 0·934–0·974 −0·614 ± 0·03 −0·675 to −0·355 1061 0·883 8025
    MB vs. MS 1·0 1·016 ± 0·02 0·976–1·056 −0·332 ± 0·06 −0·447 to −0·216 532 0·839 2765
    MB vs. ML 1·0 1·058 ± 0·01 1·027–1·090 −0·054 ± 0·05 −0·144 to 0·037 504 0·891 4083
    GB vs. GA 1·0 0·965 ± 0·02 0·920–1·010 −0·569 ± 0·06 −0·684 to −0·454 201 0·901 1812
    GB vs. GS 1·0 0·906 ± 0·03 0·848–0·954 −0·398 ± 0·08 −0·558 to −0·238 201 0·841 1052
    GB vs. GL 1·0 0·982 ± 0·02 0·935–1·022 −0·326 ± 0·06 −0·443 to −0·209 201 0·901 1999
Across Cannell (1982) data set (0·00126 ≤ MA ≤ 2723 kg d. wt; 0·00043 kg d. wt ≤ MR ≤ 462·5 kg d. wt)
    MB vs. MA 3/4–1 0·924 ± 0·01 0·900–0·947 −0·429 ± 0·02 −0·475 to −0·383 345 0·944 5786
    MB vs. MS 1·0 0·893 ± 0·01 0·871–0·917 −0·338 ± 0·02 −0·381 to −0·294 346 0·944 5806
    MB vs. ML 4/3 1·195 ± 0·02 1·116–1·274 0·598 ± 0·03 0·539 to 0·657 343 0·724 876
    GB vs. GA 1·0 1·019 ± 0·02 0·965–1·066 −0·747 ± 0·02 −0·794 to −0·700 205 0·884 1549
    GB vs. GS 1·0 0·972 ± 0·02 0·936–1·009 −0·535 ± 0·02 −0·564 to −0·505 205 0·932 2771
    GB vs. GL 1·0 0·926 ± 0·03 0·926–1·078 −0·278 ± 0·02 −0·325 to −0·230 205 0·768 671

In each case, P < 0·0001.

αPred. = predicted scaling exponent.