Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 25;111(36):13040–13045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413216111

Table 1.

Predicted lowest-energy protein structures for wild-type and mutant receptors in the apo and ligand-bound forms

Mutations Lowest-energy CCR5 conformations
Apo MVC PF APL TAK
Wild-type wt1 wt7 wt7 wt7 wt10
F109Y wt3 wt5 wt5 wt5 wt3
F112A wt1 wt5 wt5 wt5 wt3
Q194A wt1 wt5 wt5 wt5 wt4
Y251F wt1 wt2 wt22 wt4 wt3
D276A wt1 wt2 wt7 wt3 wt2
Q277A wt1 wt5 wt5 wt5 wt3
W86A wt1 wt7 wt7 wt7 wt3
A90H wt3 wt10 wt5 wt10 wt3
T105A wt1 wt2 wt6 wt6 wt3
Y108A wt3 wt2 wt22 wt5 wt22
F109A wt1 wt5 wt7 wt7 wt3
I198A wt1 wt5 wt5 wt5 wt25
Y251A wt2 wt3 wt5 wt5 wt3
Q280A wt3 wt5 wt7 wt7 wt7
E283A wt3 wt3 wt22 wt22 wt3

Ligands used are Maraviroc (MVC), PF-232798 (PF), Aplaviroc (APL), and Tak-779 (TAK). This shows that a single mutation can dramatically affect the binding site.