Table 4.
Chloroplast DNA haplotypes detected in the populations from western Mediterranean (europaea) and Hoggar (laperrinei) based on the combination of 20 loci
| Characters |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haplotype |
Lineage* |
ccmp5† |
ccmp7† |
trn T-L-poly-T |
trn T-L-poly-A |
psb K-trn S-poly-T/A |
trn G-poly-T |
trn G-R-poly T |
trn S-G-indel-1 |
trn S-G-indel-2 |
Trn T-L-TaqI |
Trn T-L-AcsI |
mat K-RsaI |
mat K-TaqI |
trn S-G-MseI |
trn S-G-NdeI |
mat K-2-TaqI |
mat K-2-MseI |
mat K-3-TaqI |
trn G-PstI |
psb K-trn S-MseI |
|||||||||||||||||||
| CE1 | E1 | 105 | 120 | 81 | 106 | 109 | 87 | 60 | 105 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL1 | E1 | 105 | 120 | 81 | 106 | 109 | 87 | 60 | 105 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL2 | E1 | 105 | 120 | 81 | 106 | 108 | 87 | 60 | 105 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL3 | E1 | 105 | 120 | 82 | 106 | 109 | 87 | 60 | 105 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL4 | E1 | 104 | 120 | 81 | 106 | 109 | 87 | 60 | 105 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCK | E3 | 106 | 120 | 81 | 106 | 109 | 87 | 60 | 114 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCK2 | E3 | 105 | 120 | 81 | 106 | 109 | 87 | 60 | 114 | 60 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| COM1 | E2 | 106 | 121 | 81 | 106 | 108 | 87 | 60 | 117 | 52 | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
| COM2 | E2 | 105 | 121 | 81 | 106 | 108 | 87 | 60 | 117 | 52 | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||||||||||||
The haplotypes CE1, CCK, CCK2, COM1 and COM2 were detected in europaea populations while CL1 to CL4 were only detected in laperrinei populations.
Eight polymorphic loci were observed.
For the nine first fragments, size variants in base pairs are given. For the next ones, restriction site presence (+) or absence (−) are indicated.
Named according to Besnard et al. (2002; unpubl. res.).
For ccmp5 and ccmp7, size of the variants was corrected comparatively to the previous estimation (Besnard et al., 2002).