Table 3.
Chlorotype identity (followingLumaret et al., 2002) and sampling size (in parentheses) in 14 mixed Quercus suber, Q. ilex and Q. coccifera populations in which all Q. suber individuals possessed a cpDNA molecule of the ‘ilex’ lineage
| Chlorotype no. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population no. |
Q. suber |
Q. ilex |
Q. coccifera |
||
| 39 | 23 (7) | 21 (11) | 21 (4) | ||
| 40 | 23 (10) | 21 (8) | – | ||
| 24 (2) | |||||
| 41 | 21 (1) | 21 (8) | 21 (5) | ||
| 23 (5) | 23 (1) | ||||
| 42 | 21 (4) | 21 (4) | – | ||
| 43 | 23 (4) | 22 (4) | – | ||
| 44 | 21 (2) | 21 (9) | – | ||
| 23 (8) | |||||
| 45 | 23 (4) | 21 (4) | – | ||
| 46 | 26 (4) | 19 (4) | 21 (3) | ||
| 21 (1) | |||||
| 50 | 21 (5) | 21 (4) | – | ||
| 82 | 12 (7) | 12 (2) | – | ||
| 13 (9) | |||||
| 83 | 12 (5) | 12 (5) | – | ||
| 84 | 12 (5) | 12 (6) | – | ||
| 85 | 12 (3) | 12 (3) | – | ||
| 86 | 12 (4) | 12 (4) | – | ||