Table 1.
Summary of genetic diversity within 25 populations of Atriplex tatarica based on nine putative allozyme loci (enzyme systems AAT, LAP, MDH, SKDH and SOD) and mean species values
| Population* |
Latitude |
Longitude |
n |
PL |
A |
Ae |
Ho |
He |
f (=FIS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 50°25′85″ | 13°26′68″ | 6 | 53·9 | 1·54 | 1·31 | 0·192 | 0·195 | 0·013 |
| B2 | 50°16′75″ | 13°24′65″ | 3 | 46·2 | 1·46 | 1·26 | 0·169 | 0·168 | −0·005 |
| B3 | 50°15′83″ | 13°23′21″ | 6 | 53·9 | 1·54 | 1·22 | 0·162 | 0·150 | −0·080 |
| B4 | 50°14′79″ | 13°24′17″ | 4 | 53·9 | 1·54 | 1·32 | 0·208 | 0·201 | −0·034 |
| B5 | 50°16′25″ | 13°21′69″ | 6 | 23·1 | 1·23 | 1·16 | 0·077 | 0·088 | 0·135 |
| B6 | 50°10′35″ | 14°29′06″ | 5 | 30·8 | 1·31 | 1·10 | 0·054 | 0·070 | 0·241 |
| B7 | 50°15′25″ | 14°09′64″ | 1 | 38·5 | 1·38 | 1·26 | 0·139 | 0·157 | 0·124 |
| B8 | 50°14′25″ | 14°07′18″ | 2 | 38·5 | 1·46 | 1·24 | 0·131 | 0·136 | 0·044 |
| B9 | 50°14′15″ | 14°05′80″ | 5 | 30·8 | 1·38 | 1·18 | 0·131 | 0·111 | −0·191 |
| B10 | 50°15′07″ | 14°02′08″ | 3 | 46·2 | 1·54 | 1·28 | 0·162 | 0·178 | 0·096 |
| B11 | 50°02′43″ | 14°35′18″ | 2 | 38·5 | 1·69 | 1·32 | 0·123 | 0·135 | 0·094 |
| M12 | 49°10′40″ | 16°30′76″ | 2 | 69·2 | 1·85 | 1·27 | 0·169 | 0·185 | 0·092 |
| M13 | 49°01′44″ | 16°36′75″ | 4 | 46·2 | 1·46 | 1·25 | 0·177 | 0·161 | −0·107 |
| M14 | 48°58′18″ | 16°27′86″ | 4 | 61·5 | 1·77 | 1·42 | 0·231 | 0·253 | 0·094 |
| M15 | 48°52′09″ | 16°24′04″ | 2 | 38·5 | 1·46 | 1·10 | 0·085 | 0·075 | −0·138 |
| M16 | 48°52′05″ | 16°41′14″ | 6 | 38·5 | 1·38 | 1·24 | 0·123 | 0·139 | 0·122 |
| M17 | 48°49′09″ | 16°44′52″ | 6 | 69·2 | 1·85 | 1·29 | 0·162 | 0·166 | 0·026 |
| M18 | 48°51′69″ | 16°52′23″ | 2 | 53·9 | 1·62 | 1·27 | 0·162 | 0·156 | −0·038 |
| M19 | 48°56′84″ | 16°58′51″ | 2 | 53·9 | 1·62 | 1·32 | 0·154 | 0·186 | 0·182 |
| M20 | 48°57′57″ | 17°02′43″ | 5 | 38·5 | 1·38 | 1·14 | 0·108 | 0·097 | −0·115 |
| M21 | 48°54′02″ | 16°50′34″ | 4 | 46·2 | 1·77 | 1·45 | 0·192 | 0·189 | −0·018 |
| M22 | 49°35′39″ | 17°17′59″ | 6 | 30·8 | 1·31 | 1·16 | 0·108 | 0·103 | −0·050 |
| M23 | 49°26′80″ | 17°06′86″ | 6 | 69·2 | 1·77 | 1·35 | 0·177 | 0·226 | 0·228 |
| M24 | 48°47′78″ | 16°46′84″ | 6 | 53·9 | 1·69 | 1·31 | 0·208 | 0·177 | −0·182 |
| M25 | 48°53′14″ | 16°15′23″ | 6 | 53·9 | 1·69 | 1·31 | 0·169 | 0·180 | 0·062 |
| Mean | 47·1 | 1·55 | 1·26 | 0·151 | 0·155 | 0·024 | |||
| (±SD) | (12·6) | (0·18) | (0·09) | (0·043) | (0·046) | (0·120) |
Number of individual sampled from each population was ten.
PL = percentage of polymorphic loci; A = average number of alleles per polymorphic locus; Ae = effective allele number; Ho = observed heterozygosity; He = expected heterozygosity; f = Weir and Cockerham's estimate (Weir and Cockerham, 1984) of FIS (Wright's fixation index) per population over loci.
Populations were assigned to six partly arbitrary classes, in which n = estimated total number of individuals: 1, n ≤ 50; 2, 50 < n ≤ 100; 3, 100 < n ≤ 200; 4, 200 < n ≤ 300; 5, 300 < n ≤ 400; 6, n > 400.
The first letter of each population name refers to the province in which the population was found, i.e. B = Bohemia and M = Moravia.