Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep 13;96(6):1129–1136. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci264

Table 3.

Linear regression coefficients associated with regression lines in Fig. 1

Study
Intercept (a)
Slope (b)
PH0: b=1
r2
n
Original studies
    FR-Med 0·045 n.s. 1·001*** n.s. 0·69*** 44
    SA-Med 0·194 n.s. 0·956*** n.s. 0·78*** 46
    SP-Med –0·106 n.s. 1·039*** n.s. 0·68*** 46
Published studies
    EU-1 –0·317 n.s. 1·197*** 0·83*** 27
    EU-2 0·209*** 0·905*** *** 0·70*** 632
    AR-Cen 0·646* 0·789*** 0·50*** 55
    CA-Qué –0·116 n.s. 1·014*** n.s. 0·65*** 33
    AU-1 0·186 n.s. 0·939*** n.s. 0·60*** 37
    AU-2 0·314 n.s. 0·888*** n.s. 0·82*** 26
    AU-3 0·167 n.s. 0·937*** n.s. 0·82*** 70
    AU-4 0·278 n.s. 0·882*** n.s. 0·90*** 23
All studies combined
0·094* ± 0·082 0·963*** ± 0·034 n.s. 0·76*** 1039

Linear regression coefficients and associated 95 % confidence intervals for all the studies (total). Regression for all studies is shown on Fig. 1C. Linear model: log(LT) = a + b log[(SLA × LDMC)−1].

LT, measured leaf thickness (µm); SLA, specific leaf area (m2 kg−1); LDMC, leaf dry matter content (mg g−1).

***

P < 0·001;

**

P < 0·01;

*

P < 0·050.

†: P < 0·100.;

n.s., not significant.

See Table 1 for study names.