Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 20;28(4):S507–S514. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000412

Table 2.

Log-binomial regression estimating the relationship between HIV prevalence and current pregnancy and survey period.

Western Eastern Southern All
Currently pregnant vs. not 1.04 (0.82, 1.33) 0.80 (0.59, 1.09) 0.89 (0.66, 1.20) 0.89 (0.73, 1.08)
Period 2 vs. period 1 0.86 (0.75, 0.98) 0.93 (0.82, 1.05) 1.04 (0.95, 1.13) 0.99 (0.93, 1.06)
Currently pregnant · period 2a 0.78 (0.54, 1.14) 0.79 (0.51, 1.22) 0.87 (0.57, 1.33) 0.82 (0.62, 1.09)

Estimates indicate relative risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for country.

aInteraction between current pregnancy and survey period estimates excess prevalence decline in HIV prevalence among currently pregnant women vs. not currently pregnant women.