Table 4.

Model 2: Standardized estimates of OVK condition for the intercept and slope of secondary and ancillary outcomes across the two-year follow-up period

		Intercept	Slope
		β (p-value)	β (p-value)	RMSEA	CFI
Condition as predictor
SO	Anxiety	-0.028 (.436)	0.079 (.303)	.037	.962
	Hopelessness	0.088 (.068)	-0.008 (.947)	.042	.952
	Happiness	0.070 (.089)	-0.026 (.599)	.032	.971
	Life satisfaction	0.038 (.238)	-0.044 (.569)	.035	.980
	Optimism	-0.098 (.005)	0.024 (.765)	.047	.954
	Active coping	-0.144 (.002)	0.257 (.010)	.049	.955
	Cognitive coping	-0.001 (.975)	0.120 (.042)	.044	.969
	Distraction coping	0.078 (.077)	-0.021 (.828)	.047	.953
	Avoidance coping
	Seeking support coping	-0.026 (.545)	0.061 (.415)	.037	.980
	Academic self-efficacy	-0.022 (.367)	0.101 (.194)	.040	.952
	Social self-efficacy	-0.135 (.000)	0.229 (.039)	.040	.960
	Emotional self-efficacy	-0.038 (.093)	0.067 (.288)	.035	.960
AO	School grades	-0.175 (.003)	.092 (.353)	.044	.843
	Classroom atmosphere	-0.026 (.861)	-.055 (.757)	.030	.959
	Alcohol use past 4-weeks
	Current smoking
	Truancy	-0.152 (.462)	-.022 (.879)	.014	.979

Note. Condition: 0 = control group, 1 = intervention group. SO = secondary outcomes, AO = ancillary outcomes. In these analyses, control variables, baseline levels of outcome variables, and school clustering was taken into account. For the dichotomous outcome ‘Truancy’, the WLSMV estimator was used, and unstandardized regression coefficients were provided. Significant effects are presented in bold.