Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul 31;19(10):3236–3245. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2492-2

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of permanent section studies

Study Year Country Carcinoma type BCS Age range
(y)
n Reexcision ratea LOE Study type
Arora et al.24 2007 USA ADH, DCIS Lumpectomy 42–87 44 55.0 % (24) 1 Retrospective cohort
Aziz et al.5 2006 Canada IC, DCIS Lumpectomy 55b 1,172 13.0 % (152) 1 Retrospective cohort
Cabioglu et al.14 2007 USA IC, DCIS Wide local excision, segmental
mastectom
27–95 261 44.0% (116) 1 Retrospective cohort
Camp et al.15 (personal communication) 2005 USA IC, DCIS Lumpectomy 26–78 78 33.3 % (26) 1 Retrospective cohort
Huston et al.25 2006 USA DCIS, LCIS, IDC,
ILC
Lumpectomy 30–91 171 29.2 % (50) 2 Retrospective cohort
Landercasper et al.26 2010 USA Breast cancer Lumpectomy 568 19.0 % (108) 1 Retrospective cohort hospital
report
Loibl et al.16 2006 Germany ILC, IDC Lumpectomy 26–78 248 27.0 % (67) 1 Retrospective cohort RCT–GEPARDUO
McCahill et al.27 2010 USA DCIS, IDC, ILC Partial mastectom 712 13.0 % (95) 2 Retrospective cohort
Menes et al.28 2005 USA DCIS, ILC, IDC Lumpectomy 27–87 459 49.9 % (229) 1 Retrospective cohort
Prospective database
Miller et al.29 2004 USA DCIS, ILC, IDC BCS 38–64 143 18.2 % (26) 1 Retrospective cohort
Moorthy et al.30 2004 UK IDC, ILC Lumpectomy, wide local
excision, quadrantectomy
47–73 505 27.1 % (137) 1 Prospective cohort
Mullenix et al.31 2004 USA IDC, ILC BCS 48–73 150 51.0 % (90) 1 Retrospective cohort,
prospective database
Ooi et al.32 2003 Australia DCIS, ILC, IDC, IC,
medullary
BCS 28–80 742 3.9 % (29) 2 Retrospective cohort
O’Sullivan et al.33 2007 USA IDC, DCIS, ILC Lumpectomy 20–91 2,770 59.6 % (1,651) 1 Retrospective cohort,
prospective database
Perez34 2003 USA ILC, IDC Quadrantectomy, wide local
excision, local excision
1,347 52.3 % (704) 1 Retrospective cohort
Ramanah et al.35 2008 France ILC, IDC Lumpectomy, wide local
excision
44–68 206 41.0 % (84) 1 Retrospective cohort
Sanchez et al.36 2010 USA IDC, ILC, DCIS,
atypia
BCS 22–88 351 34.0% (118) 2 Retrospective cohort
van den Broek et al.37 2007 Netherlands ILC BCS 416 14.4 % (60) 2 Retrospective cohort
Vicini et al.38 2001 USA DCIS Excisional biopsy 146 64.0 % (95) 2 Retrospective cohort
Results 351b 35 % (±3 %)c

BCS breast conservation surgery, LOE level of evidence (SORT), ADH atypical ductal hyperplasia, IC invasive carcinoma, DCIS ductal carcinoma-in-situ, LCIS lobular carcinoma-in-situ, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma

a

After first BCS

b

Sample median

c

Pooled estimates