Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sleep Med Clin. 2014 Jun 1;9(2):261–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2014.02.007

Table 2.

Between-group effect size estimates for CBT-I and hybrid interventions on key outcomes at post-intervention

Diary SOL Diary SE Diary WASO Diary TST Pain Severity Functional Pain Measure

Studies in which CBT-I was the active treatment
Currie et al. 0.76 1.02 0.94 0.40 0.51 --

Rybarczyk et al./Vitiello et al. 0.36 0.75 0.89 0.03 0.53

Edinger et al.a 0.08 0.73 1.51 0.01 0.17 --

Jungquist et al. 2.28 1.95 1.69 1.12 0.81 0.67 (MPI)
1.06 (PDI)

Studies in which hybrid CBT-I/P was the active treatment
Pigeon et al.b -- 1.48 -- 0.66 0.37 0.39 (PDI)

Tang et al. 1.84 1.94 2.10 0.73 0.05 1.34 (BPI)

Note. Values are Cohen’s d effect size estimates derived from between-group (treatment vs. control) comparisons at post-treatment time points.

a

Study included multiple control groups; effect size derived from CBT-I/usual care comparison

b

Study included multiple control groups; effect size derived from Hybrid/ wait-list control comparison

MPI = Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Pain-Interference Subscale; PDI = Pain Disability Index; BPI = Brief Pain Inventory, Pain-Interference Subscale