Table 5.
ROI | Friend’s faces |
Unfamiliar faces |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FB | D[SG] | NSSN | FB | D[SG] | NSSN | |
L amygdala | – | 0.44** | 0.36* | – | 0.46** | 0.34* |
R amygdala | 0.49** | 0.35* | – | 0.55** | 0.38* | 0.31‡ |
R subgenual ACC | – | – | – | – | – | – |
L posterior ITS | – | –† | – | – | –† | – |
L posterior SFG (premotor) | – | – | – | – | – | – |
R posterior STS | – | –† | – | – | –† | – |
L MTG | – | 0.30‡ | – | – | 0.42* | – |
R MTG | – | –† | – | –† | –† | – |
L entorhinal | – | – | – | – | – | – |
R entorhinal | 0.35* | –† | – | –† | –† | – |
L OFC | – | – | – | – | – | – |
R OFC | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Bold text indicates that the VBM correlations were also significant in this brain region. The ‘†’ symbol indicates that there was a significant correlation when the fixation condition was not included as a covariate, potentially because a degree of freedom was lost during this process. †Approaching significance at P < 0.10; *significant at P < 0.05; **significant at P < 0.01.