. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2014 Oct;48(2):145–155. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9585-4

Table 3.

Summary of hierarchical regression analyses: the moderating role of level of satisfaction with social support in the relationship between diabetes burden and diabetes distress.

	DDS total			Emotional			Regimen			Interpersonal			Physician
	b	p	R²	b	p	R²	b	p	R²	b	p	R²	b	p	R²
Step 1: Age	−.02	.067	.14	−.02	.138	.14	−.04	.011	.14	−.01	.453	.16	−.01	.345	.06
Sex	.10	.671		.14	.612		.25	.355		−.38	.143		.20	.438
Insulin	.46	.060		.57	.052		.52	.074		.29	.290		.38	.169
Comp	.37	.127		.49	.094		.40	.171		.33	.238		.22	.436
SAT	−.16	.039		−.19	.045		−.10	.281		−.29	.001		−.11	.232

Step 2a: Age	−.02	.066	.14	−.02	.133	.14	−.04	.011	.14	−.01	.429	.18	−.01	.350	.06
Sex	.09	.689		.13	.647		.26	.344		−.41	.121		.21	.434
Insulin	.46	.061		.56	.053		.52	.075		.29	.293		.38	.170
Comp	.61	.430		1.1	.221		.03	.970		1.4	.101		.06	.950
SAT	−.14	.215		−.12	.358		−.14	.291		−.17	.160		−.12	.327
Comp x SAT	−.05	.746		−.13	.464		.08	.677		−.23	.181		.03	.847

Step 2b: Age	−.02	.058	.18	−.02	.127	.16	−.04	.010	.15	−.01	.438	.18	−.01	.309	.12
Sex	.10	.672		.14	.613		.25	.355		−.38	.140		.20	.431
Insulin	2.0	.010		2.1	.027		1.8	.057		.1.4	.109		2.7	.003
Comp	.37	.120		.49	.090		.40	.168		.33	.235		.22	.418
SAT	−.04	.679		−.07	.546		.00	.996		−.20	.068		.07	.503
Insulin x SAT	−.33	.036		−.32	.090		−.27	.153		−.24	.178		−.47	.007

Step 3: Age	−.02	.059	.18	−.02	.126	.16	−.04	.010	.15	−.01	.421	.19	−.01	.319	.12
Sex	.10	.670		.13	.643		.26	.334		−.40	.123		.21	.405
Insulin	2.0	.011		2.0	.037		1.9	.046		1.3	.169		2.8	.002
Comp	.31	.685		.86	.357		−.23	.805		1.3	.158		−.40	.647
SAT	−.05	.700		−.04	.794		−.06	.684		−.12	.374		.02	.898
Comp x SAT	.01	.934		−.08	.678		.13	.478		−.19	.272		.13	.456
Insulin x SAT	−.33	.039		−.30	.114		−.29	.125		−.20	.266		−.50	.005

Conditional effects for Insulin	Effect	p	95% CI										Effect	p	95% CI

−1SD	1.1	.001	.45–1.7										1.1	.001	.46–1.8
M	.60	.006	.17-.10										.46	.057	−.01–.94
+1SD	−.22	.441	−.34–.78										−.10	.761	−.72–.53

Note: COMP = Presence of complications, SAT = level of perceived satisfaction with social support. Significant p-values (p < .05) are in bold.