Skip to main content

Table 2.

Predictive capacity of anthropometric equations for visceral AT area of the trunk in adults

Author Method VAT area equations R2(%) Age range (y) Cross-validation
Seidell et al. [91] CT = (0.35*BMI) + (1.48*∑ umbiliusSF and suprailiacSF) + (34.122*WHR) + (0.06*age) – 37.322 (M) 81.9 19–85 no
= (0.367*BMI) + (WTR*10.911) + (0.994*menopausal statea) – 15.083 (F) 79.5
Kvist et al. [94] CT VAT (cm3) = (0.731*sagittal diameterb) – 11.5 (M) 81.0 24–64 yes
VAT (cm3) = (0.370*sagittal diameterb) – 4.85 (F) 79.6
Weits et al. [99] CT = (3.27071*WC) + (3.74794*HC) – 558.25696 (M) 74.0 16–81 yes
= (2.00558*WC) + (2.32435*HC) – 319.21927 (F) 56.0
Ferland et al. [98] CT = (1.0652*weight) + (1.6649*abdominalSF) + (1.6934*subscapularSF) + (200.9726*WHR) + (1.7137*age) – 292.1026 (F) 73.7 23–50 no
Despés et al. [102] CT = (2.843*WC) + (2.125*age) – 225.39 (M) 74.0 18–42 no
Koester et al. [103] CT = (3.4838*WC) – (67.0158*log chest ratioc) – 157.7378 (M) 67.0 18–30 yes
Kekes–Szabo et al. [95] CT = (4.37*WC) +(0.75*age) + (1.26*abdominalSF) – (1.55*∑legCCd) – 202.04 (M) 73.0 18–71 yes
Bonora et al. [76] MRI = (6.37*WC) – 453.7 (M) 56.0 22–70 no
= (4.04*WC) + (2.62*age) – 370.5 (F) 68.0
Kekes-Szabo et al. [96] CT = (2.57*umbilicusCC) + (0.69*suprailiacSF) + (0.92*age) – 188.61 (F) 75.0 17–76 yes
Schreiner et al. [97] MRI eWHR, age (M) 32.9 48–68 no
eWC (F) 42.8
Stanforth et al. [107] CT Ln (VAT) = (0.05*BMI) + (3.2*WHR) + (0.02*age) + (0.36*racef) – 0.70 (M) 78.0
73.0
17–65 yes
Ln (VAT) = (0.05*BMI) + (1.85*WHR) + (0.02*age) + (0.22*racef) + 0.33 (F)
Brundavani et al. [104] CT = (1.09*weight) – (2.29*BMI) + (6.04*WC) – 382.9 (M) 74.2 40–79 no
= (5.19*WC) – (0.86*weight) – 278 (F) 62.6
Bouza et al. [105] CT = (3.413*WC) – (2.281*HC) + (3.306*age) – 27.765 (M+F) 62.0 18–78 no
Goel et al. [106] MRI = (16.9*age) + (934.18*sexg) + (578.09*BMI) – (441.06*HC) + (434.2*WC) – 238.7 (M+F) 52.1 15–50 no
Eastwood et al. [108] CT = h (1.87*age) + (2.80*weight) – (1.79*height) + (7.57*WC) – (4.91*HC) – (2.85*TC) + 67.88 (M) 69.0 58–85 yes
= h (0.90*age) + (2.71*weight) + (2.62*WC) – (1.75*TC) – 250.86 (F) 62.0
= i (0.94*age) + (8.63*WC) + (1.47*TC) – (3.86*HC) – 422.31 (M) 73.0
= i (2.20*age) + (3.20*weight) – (2.42*height) + (3.35*WC) – (4.93*HC) + 323.39 (F) 56.0
= j (1.18*age) + (2.16*weight) – (2.35*height) + (6.56*WC) – (2.15*HC) – (1.81*TC) + 39.24 (M) 61.0
= j (1.13*age) + (6.28*weight) – (2.47*height) + (1.85*WC) – (3.71*HC) – (4.35*TC) + 475.69 (F) 55.0

AT=adipose tissue; BMI = body mass index (kg/m2); WC = waist circumference (cm); HC = hip circumference (cm); TC = thigh circumference (cm); CC= circumference (cm); WHR = waist-to-hip ratio; WTR = waist-to-thigh ratio; VAT = visceral adipose tissue (cm2); CT = computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; M = for men, F = for women;

a

1 = postmenopausal, 0 = premenopausal;

b

obtained by CT (cm);

c

logarithm of the chest circumference divided by the chest skinfold thickness;

d

∑legCC = sum of the mid-thigh and lower thigh circumference (cm);

e

exact equation not given;

f

black = 0, white = 1;

g

male = 1, female = 2;

h

white European;

i

African Caribbean;

j

South Asian; sagittal diameter (cm); age (years).