Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1095–1107. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1608

Table 3.

Subgroup Analyses

Category Study Subgroup Characteristic Number of Studies in Subgroup* Ratio of Relative Risks of Readmission+ (95% CI) P Value for Interaction
Patient Characteristics Patients Enrolled had CHF 16 1.02 (0.82 to 1.27) 0.83
Patients Enrolled were Aged >65 36 0.87 (0.69 to 1.10) 0.24
Patients Enrolled were from General Medical Ward 18 0.97 (0.78 to 1.21) 0.79
Intervention Characteristics Intervention was Rated to Increase Capacity 16 0.76 (0.59 to 0.99) 0.04
Intervention was Rated to Increase Workload 5# 0.93 (0.67 to 1.29) 0.68
Intervention was Rated to Decrease Workload 19# 0.99 (0.78 to 1.25) 0.90
b Study was Published in 2001 or Later 24 1.59 (1.05 to 2.40) 0.03
a Two or More Individuals Delivered the Intervention 13 0.79 (0.63 to 1.00) 0.05
a Five or More Meaningful Patient Interactions in the Intervention 13 0.91 (0.73 to 1.14) 0.43
a Five or More Unique Activities in the Intervention 16 0.70 (0.56 to 0.86) <0.01
Intervention had Both an Inpatient and Outpatient Component 22 0.92 (0.74 to 1.15) 0.46
Outcome Characteristics Outcome Measured was Unplanned Readmissions 9^ 0.95 (0.76 to 1.21) 0.70
+

This represents the ratio of pooled relative risks of early hospital readmission among studies that had a certain characteristic as compared to those that did not have this characteristic.

*

Compared to the remainder of analyzed studies (e.g. 42-N) unless otherwise noted.

#

Compared to “No Change,” (N=18).

^

Compared to “All-Cause,” (N=30).

a

These cut-offs were chosen as they represented the 75th percentile of distribution of each variable.

b

This cut-off was chosen as it represented the mid-point of study eligibility for this review.