Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2011 Feb 21;153(1):111–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08477.x

Table III.

Multivariate regression models of creatinine clearance, urinary calcium to creatinine ratio (UCa:UCr), urinary albumin, and total urinary protein by chelation group.

Model and significant predictors All chelators
No deferasirox
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Model: High creatinine clearance (vs. normal)
 Regular transfusion status (yes vs. no) 0·39 0·17–0·88 0·42 0·18–0·94
 Serum transferrin receptor 1·03 1·01–1·05 1·03 1·01–1·05
 Dietary calcium intake (mg) 1·00 1·00–1·01
Model: High UCa:UCr (vs. normal)
 Regular transfusion status (yes vs. no) 3·72 1·24–11·2 3·54 1·17–10·7
 Serum transferrin receptor 0·98 0·95–0·99
Model: Detectable albumin (vs. not detectable)
 Serum transferrin receptor 1·04 1·01–1·06 1·03 1·01–1·06
Serum ferritin 0·81 0·67–0·98
 Failure to thrive (yes vs. no) 0·48 0·24–0·95
β P β P

Model: Total protein (log-transformed)
 Serum transferrin receptor 0·015 <0·0001 0·016 <0·0001

All models controlled for age and gender.

All patients, regardless of iron chelator, were included.

Patient receiving deferasirox (N = 17) were excluded from the analyses.

OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval