Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;111(47):16694–16699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412953111

Table 1.

CH4 emissions from various models

Lead author Model Emissions, Tg Averaging period Ref(s).
Land surface models
Melton DLEM 0.8 ± 0.2 1993–2004 (49)
Melton LPJ-Bern 1.2 ± 0.3 1993–2004 (49)
Melton LPJ-WHyMe 6 ± 1 1993–2004 (49)
Melton LPJ-WSL 0.9 ± 0.2 1993–2004 (49)
Melton ORCHIDEE 1.0 ± 0.4 1993–2004 (49)
Melton SDGVM 0.7 ± 0.2 1993–2004 (49)
Riley CLM4Me 5 ± 2 2001–2010 (50)
Zhu 2.6 ± 0.1 2000–2009 (51)
Zhuang TEM 3 (annual) 1980–1996 (32)
Matthews 4.34 (52)
Inverse models
Bergamaschi TM5-4DVAR 1.3 ± 0.3 2001–2010 (15)
Bruhwiler CT-CH4 1.5 ± 0.2 2000–2009 (16)
Chen MATCH 2 ± 1 1996–2001 (17)
This study 2.1 ± 0.5 2012

Emissions were calculated for the region 55–75° N, 141–169° W for May to September of the given years, except TEM, where the given value is the annual emission for all of Alaska. CLM4Me, community land model with CH4 biogeochemistry; CT-CH4, CarbonTracker-CH4; DLEM, dynamic land surface ecosystem model; LPJ, Lund–Potsdam–Jena dynamic global vegetation model; MATCH, model for atmospheric transport and chemistry; ORCHIDEE, organizing carbon and hydrology in dynamic ecosystems; SDGVM, Sheffield dynamic global vegetation model; TEM, terrestrial ecosystem model; TM5-4DVAR, tracer model V5-4-dimensional variational inverse modeling system; WHyMe, wetland hydrology and methane; WSL, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research.