Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;111(47):16748–16753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406990111

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of experimental structure factors SM(q) for α-crystallin solutions with polydisperse hard-sphere Percus–Yevick liquid-structure models, showing the basis for the parameter values p=0.20 and d=15 nm used in the present work. (Top) SAXS SM(q) for c=290 mg/mL, corresponding to a deduced ϕ=0.49. Percus–Yevick predictions are shown for three polydispersity parameters: p=0 (monodisperse, thin gray line), p=0.1 (dotted-dashed red line), and p=0.20 (thick black line). p=0.20 closely reproduces the measured SM(q), whereas the less polydisperse and monodisperse models do not match the data. (Bottom) Over the entire range of lower α-crystallin concentrations measured, the same polydisperse Percus–Yevick SM(q) with p=0.20 (solid lines) closely reproduces the experimental SM(q).