Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 9;3(1):101–108. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.440

Table II.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary lesions.

Sensitivity Specificity PLR NLR DOR Threshold effect
18F-FLT PET
  Pooled estimates 0.81 0.7 4.01 0.27 12.58 P=0.383
  95% CI 0.74–0.87 0.61–0.77 1.62–9.88 0.20–0.37 6.81–23.24
  Cochran-Q (P-value) 3.85 (0.6973) 40.61 (0.0000) 32.15 (0.0000) 3.74 (0.7114) 8.95 (0.1766)
  I2 value, % 0.00 85.20 81.30 0.00 32.90
18F-FDG PET
  Pooled estimates 0.92 0.5 2.01 0.17 10.72 P=0.645
  95% CI 0.86–0.95 0.41–0.58 1.38–2.93 0.10–0.29 5.51–20.87
  Cochran-Q (P-value) 2.51 (0.8670) 15.56 (0.0163) 18.92 (0.0043) 4.30 (0.6360) 6.46 (0.3734)
  I2 value, % 0.00 67.50 68.30 0.00 7.20

PET, positron emission tomography; FLT, fluorothymidine; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; PLR, positive-likelihood ratio; NLR, negative-likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio.