Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 29;3(1):63–68. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.432

Table II.

Univariate analysis for cancer-specific survival following development of liver metastasis (LM).

Clinicopathological factors P-value
Agea, years (60> vs. 60≤) 0.1172
Sarcomatoid differentiationb (+ vs. −) 0.0067
Histological grade 3b (+ vs. −) 0.2898
Fuhrman gradeb (<3 vs. 4) 0.4066
MVIb (+ vs. −) 0.9872
Tumor necrosisb (+ vs. −) 0.8618
Tumor sizeb (<10 vs. ≥10 cm) 0.9160
pT1 or 2 vs. pT3 or 4b 0.3196
Presence of LM at Nx (yes vs. no) 0.0992
No. of LM at presentation (1 vs. ≥2) 0.4447
ECOG PSa (0 or 1 vs. 2≤) 0.0002
CRPa (<1.0 vs. ≥1.0 mg/dl) 0.0019
LDHa, IU/l (<338 vs. ≥338) 0.9019
Hemoglobina (anemia vs. normal) 0.1704
Platelet counta (<35×104 vs. ≥35×104/mm3) 0.3434
Corrected calciuma (<10 vs. ≥10 mg/dl) 0.0100
LM only (yes vs. no) 0.0367
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (yes vs. no) 0.8848
Cytokine therapy (yes vs. no) 0.7278
Local treatment (yes vs. no) 0.8373
Hepatic resection (yes vs. no) 0.0528
Interval from Nx to LM, months (<24 vs. ≥24) 0.4218
a

At the time of LM.

b

Primary lesion. MVI, microvascular invasion; Nx, nephrectomy; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.