Table 1.
Operating characteristics for the white blood cell count as a predictor of appendicitis.
Author | Subjects | WBC count (10,000 cell/mm3) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | +LR | −LR | AUC (Accuracy) | Study type | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agrawal et al.27 (2008) | 145 | ≥11 | 79 | 55 | 1.76 | 0.38 | Prospective | ||
Al-gaithy37 (2012) | 456 | ≥9.4 | 77 | 66 | 2.26 | 0.35 | 0.70 | Retrospective | |
Andersson et al.28 (1999) | 502 | ≥10 | 78 | 68 | 2.44 | 0.33 | 0.80 | Observational | |
Andersson2 (2004) | 3382 | ≥10 | 83 | 67 | 2.52 | 0.26 | Meta-Analysis: 14 studies | ||
≥15 | 25 | 93 | 3.57 | 0.81 | |||||
Deballon et al.41 (2008) | 135 | ≥9.6 | 86 | 43 | 1.51 | 0.33 | 0.75 | Prospective | |
Fergusson et al.39 (2002) | 1013 | ≥12 | 74 | 72 | 2.64 | 0.36 | 0.80 | Retrospective | |
Keskek et al.29 (2007) | 540 | ≥10.5 | 84 | 53 | 1.79 | 0.30 | Retrospective | ||
Khan et al.30 (2004) | 259 | ≥11 | 83 | 62 | 2.18 | 0.27 | Retrospective | ||
Kharbanda et al.40 (2011) | 280 | ≥14.6 | 68 | 80 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.78 | Prospective | Patients age 3–18 |
Mentes et al.31 (2012) | 201 | ≥11.9 | 72 | 77 | 3.13 | 0.36 | 0.72 | Retrospective | |
Ng et al.32 (2002) | 282 | ≥11 | 82 | 39 | 1.34 | 0.46 | Retrospective | ||
Sengupta et al.33 (2009) | 98 | ≥11 | 65 | 72 | 2.32 | 0.49 | Prospective | ||
Shaw et al.45 (2011) | 297 | ≥11 | 70, 71 | 82, 55 | 3.9, 1.6 | 0.37, 0.53 | Retrospective Cohort | Study performed at 2 different hospitals. Results listed for each hospital | |
Wu et al.25 (2012) | 144 | ≥11 | 80 | 71 | 2.76 | 0.28 | Retrospective | ||
Xharra et al.34 (2012) | 173 | ≥10 | 85 | 68 | 2.66 | 0.22 | 0.83 | Prospective | |
Yang et al.47 (2006) | 897 | 10.4 | 86 | 32 | 1.26 | 0.44 | Retrospective | ||
Yidrim et al.42 (2006) | 85 | ≥12.4 | 87 | 64 | 2.42 | 0.2 | 0.84 | Retrospective | |
Yu et al.36 (2012) | 1011 | Elevated (pooled) | 62 | 75 | 2.48 | 0.51 | 0.72 | Meta-analysis: 7 studies |
WBC, white blood cell; LR, likelihood ratio; AUC, area under curve