Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 7;15(7):859–871. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568

Table 1.

Operating characteristics for the white blood cell count as a predictor of appendicitis.

Author Subjects WBC count (10,000 cell/mm3) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) +LR −LR AUC (Accuracy) Study type Comments
Agrawal et al.27 (2008) 145 ≥11 79 55 1.76 0.38 Prospective
Al-gaithy37 (2012) 456 ≥9.4 77 66 2.26 0.35 0.70 Retrospective
Andersson et al.28 (1999) 502 ≥10 78 68 2.44 0.33 0.80 Observational
Andersson2 (2004) 3382 ≥10 83 67 2.52 0.26 Meta-Analysis: 14 studies
≥15 25 93 3.57 0.81
Deballon et al.41 (2008) 135 ≥9.6 86 43 1.51 0.33 0.75 Prospective
Fergusson et al.39 (2002) 1013 ≥12 74 72 2.64 0.36 0.80 Retrospective
Keskek et al.29 (2007) 540 ≥10.5 84 53 1.79 0.30 Retrospective
Khan et al.30 (2004) 259 ≥11 83 62 2.18 0.27 Retrospective
Kharbanda et al.40 (2011) 280 ≥14.6 68 80 3.4 0.4 0.78 Prospective Patients age 3–18
Mentes et al.31 (2012) 201 ≥11.9 72 77 3.13 0.36 0.72 Retrospective
Ng et al.32 (2002) 282 ≥11 82 39 1.34 0.46 Retrospective
Sengupta et al.33 (2009) 98 ≥11 65 72 2.32 0.49 Prospective
Shaw et al.45 (2011) 297 ≥11 70, 71 82, 55 3.9, 1.6 0.37, 0.53 Retrospective Cohort Study performed at 2 different hospitals. Results listed for each hospital
Wu et al.25 (2012) 144 ≥11 80 71 2.76 0.28 Retrospective
Xharra et al.34 (2012) 173 ≥10 85 68 2.66 0.22 0.83 Prospective
Yang et al.47 (2006) 897 10.4 86 32 1.26 0.44 Retrospective
Yidrim et al.42 (2006) 85 ≥12.4 87 64 2.42 0.2 0.84 Retrospective
Yu et al.36 (2012) 1011 Elevated (pooled) 62 75 2.48 0.51 0.72 Meta-analysis: 7 studies

WBC, white blood cell; LR, likelihood ratio; AUC, area under curve