Table 3.
Concept | Definition | Items 1 |
---|---|---|
Attitudes toward adoption | Attitudes toward adoption of genome-guided prescribing CDS | Twelve items (Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale—Genome Informed Interventions, EBPAS-GII) 2 |
Perceived usefulness | Perceived usefulness of genome-guided prescribing CDS | Two items: patient genotype data is useful for making prescribing decisions; decision support aids are useful for making prescribing decisions Rating scales range from 1 to 5: 1 = definitely false 2 = mostly false 3 = don’t know 4 = mostly true 5 = definitely true |
Awareness | Awareness of genome-guided prescribing CDS | Two items: how aware are you of decision support aids; how aware are you of genome-guided prescribing Rating scales are binary: 0 = unaware of use 1 = aware of use |
Experience | Experience with genome-guided prescribing CDS | Two items: how often do you use decision support aids; how often do you perform genome-guided prescribing Rating scales range from 0 to 2: 0 = never use 1 = sometimes use 2 = often use |
Comfort using technology | Comfort using computers and the local electronic health record system | Two items: how comfortable are you with using computers; how comfortable are you with using Epic (the local electronic health record system)? Rating scale ranges from 1 to 5: 1 = not at all comfortable 2 = not very comfortable 3 = neither comfortable or uncomfortable 4 = comfortable 5 = very comfortable |
Covariate | Socially desirable response (SDR) scale 3 |