Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2012 Aug 31;12(1):78–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00830.x

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Static dowel assessment of sensitivity and development of AFT to the ataxic effects of ethanol in HAP/LAP-3 mice (N = 24–26 per line) using the two-recovery approach. (a) Time taken to lose upright position on the dowel immediately following the 1.75 g/kg injection of ethanol. HAP-3 mice lost the ability to stay on the dowel significantly earlier than LAP-3 mice (P < .05) (b) DOI following the initial injection of ethanol for each recovery. HAP-3 and LAP-3 lines did not differ on recovery time. (c) BEC measurement at each recovery. No differences were detected for BEC values. (d) Development of AFT (BEC 2 – BEC 1). The lines did not differ in AFT development. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001