Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 May 2;98(15):6715–6723. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5746-z

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The maximal unique matches index (Coorevits et al. 2011) was used to compare the GsNUB3621 genome sequence with those of other Geobacillus species (namely, Geobacillus sp. WCH70, Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93, Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426, Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2, Geobacillus thermoleovorans CCB_US3_UF5, Geobacillus sp. Y4.1MC1, Geobacillus sp. Y412MC52, Geobacillus sp. Y412MC61, Geobacillus sp. C56-T3, Geobacillus sp. GHH01, and Geobacillus thermoglucosidans TNO-09.020). The phylogenetic separation between Geobacillus sp. Y412MC52 and Geobacillus sp. Y412MC61 can only be detected at higher resolutions