Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 23;13:104. doi: 10.1186/s40200-014-0104-3

Table 7.

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the type 2 diabetic patients according to their occupations

Defining bodies Sex n Agriculture Business Office job *p-value
WHO Total 860 422 (82.9) 260 (81.8) 178 (76.1) >0.050
Male 470 137 (83.5) 206 (82.1) 127 (73.0) <0.050
Female 390 285 (82.6) 54 (80.6) 51 (85.0) >0.050
p-value - >0.050 >0.050 >0.050 -
NCEP ATPIII Total 884 447 (87.8) 241 (75.8) 196 (83.8) <0.001
Male 462 141 (86.0) 177 (70.5) 144 (82.8) <0.001
Female 422 306 (88.7) 64(95.5) 52 (86.7) >0.050
p-value - >0.050 <0.001 >0.050 -
IDF Total 854 439(86.2) 236(74.2) 179 (76.5) <0.001
Male 410 109 (66.5) 180 (71.7) 121 (69.5) >0.050
Female 444 330 (95.7) 56 (83.6) 58 (96.7) <0.001
p-value - <0.001 <0.050 <0.001 -
Harmonized Total 972 479 (94.1) 286 (89.9) 207 (88.5) <0.050
Male 518 149 (90.9) 220 (87.6) 149 (85.6) >0.050
Female 454 330 (95.7) 66 (98.5) 58 (96.7) >0.050
p-value - <0.050 <0.010 <0.050 -

Values are presented as n (%). *p-values (2-tailed): Chi-square tests were performed to compare the prevalence of MetS between male and female patients of different occupations (rows) and within the individual occupation (column).