Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;20(4):249–264. doi: 10.1310/sci2004-249

Table 1. Demographic information on all participants with a traumatic (TR) or nontraumatic (NT) SCI.

Category variables All participants
(N = 1,549)
% (95% CI)
TR lesion
(n = 1,137)
% (95% CI)
NT lesion
(n = 412)
% (95% CI)
Pa
Canadian regions NS
 Atlantic 10.1 (9-12) 10.2 (9-12) 10.0 (7-13)
 Quebec 25.6 (23-28) 24.2 (22-27) 29.4 (25-34)
 Ontario 22.3 (20-25) 21.5 (19-24) 24.5 (20-29)
 Prairies 22.9 (21-25) 24.1 (22-27) 19.4 (16-24)
 British Columbia 19.1 (17-21) 20.0 (18-22) 16.7 (13-21)
Location of residence (population) .0506
 >100,000 62.2 (58-63) 60.5 (58-63) 67.1 (62-72)
 10,000-100,000 16.5 (14-18) 17.6 (15-20) 13.4 (10-17)
 <10,000 21.3 (19-23) 21.9 (20-24) 19.5 (16-24)
Ethnicity NS
 Majority (White) 91.4 (90-93) 92.0 (90-93) 90.0 (87-93)
 Minorities 8.6 (7-10) 8.0 (7-10) 10.0 (7-13)
Language preference .032
 French 24.3 (22-27) 22.9 (20-25) 28.2 (24-33)
 English 75.7 (73-78) 77.1 (75-80) 71.8 (67-76)
Gender <.001
 Male 67.2 (65-70) 70.9 (68-73) 57.0 (52-62)
 Female 32.8 (30-35) 29.1 (27-32) 43.0 (38-48)
Living arrangement .029
 Single individual living with others 5.9 (5-7) 6.3 (5-8) 4.9 (3-8)
 Single individual living alone 26.0 (24-28) 26.9 (24-30) 23.5 (20-28)
 Living with spouse/partner 40.8 (38-43) 39.6 (37-42) 44.2 (39-49)
 Parent living with spouse or partner and children 10.1 (9-12) 10.4 (9-12) 9.5 (7-13)
 Single parent living with children 5.2 (4-6) 5.9 (5-7) 3.4 (2-6)
 Child living with 2 parents with or without siblings 8.5 (7-10) 8.4 (7-10) 9.2 (7-13)
 Other 2.5 (2-3) 2.0 (1-3) 3.6 (2-6)
 Undeclared 0.8 (0-1) 0.5 (0-1) 1.7 (1-4)
Marital status NS
 Married 41.8 (39-44) 41.0 (38-44) 43.9 (39-49)
 Common-law 9.7 (8-11) 9.4 (8-11) 10.4 (8-14)
 Widowed, separated, or divorced 18.2 (16-20) 18.0 (16-20) 18.7 (15-23)
 Single, never married 29.4 (27-32) 31.0 (28-34) 24.8 (21-29)
 Undeclared 1.0 (1-2) 0.5 (0-1) 2.2 (1-4)
Education level NS
 Less than high school 14.3 (13-16) 13.9 (12-16) 15.5 (12-19)
 High school 23.3 (21-26) 23.7 (21-26) 22.4 (19-27)
 Postsecondary education 34.8 (32-37) 34.0 (31-37) 36.9 (32-42)
 University 27.6 (25-30) 28.4 (26-31) 25.1 (21-30)
Personal incomeb <.001
 <$30,000 50.7 (48-53) 48.1 (45-51) 58.1 (53-63)
 $30,000 to $59,999 30.6 (28-33) 31.0 (28-34) 29.7 (25-35)
 $60,000 and over 18.7 (17-21) 21.0 (18-24) 12.2 (9-16)
Household incomeb .007
 <$30,000 32.1 (30-35) 30.3 (27-33) 37.2 (32-43)
 $30,000 to $59,999 28.5 (26-31) 27.7 (25-31) 30.6 (26-36)
 $60,000 and over 39.5 (37-42) 41.9 (39-45) 32.2 (27-38)
Income sourcesc
 Wage/salary 26.2 (24-28) 28.9 (26-32) 18.7 (15-23) <.001
 Government pension 27.8 (26-30) 25.5 (23-28) 34.0 (29-39) <.001
 Employer pension 11.6 (10-13) 9.8 (8-12) 16.7 (13-21) <.001
 Vehicle insurance 9.7 (8-11) 12.5 (11-15) 1.9 (1-4) <.001
 Provincial program 11.6 (10-13) 10.4 (9-12) 14.8 (12-19) .008
 Federal program 14.8 (13-17) 14.6 (13-17) 15.3 (12-19) NS
 Do not want to answer 7.6 (6-9) 6.9 (5-9) 9.7 (7-13) NS
Lesion severity <.001
 Complete 33.3 (31-36) 39.1 (36-42) 17.5 (14-22)
 Incomplete 66.7 (64-69) 60.9 (58-64) 82.5 (78-86)
Lesion level <.001
 Paraplegia 57.8 (55-60) 50.3 (47-53) 78.6 (74-82)
 Tetraplegia 42.2 (40-45) 49.7 (47-53) 21.4 (18-26)
AISd <.001
 A 36.7 (34-39) 42.8 (40-46) 19.9 (16-24)
 B 7.5(6-9) 9.1 (7-11) 3.2 (2-5)
 C 19.5 (18-22) 18.3 (16-21) 22.8 (19-27)
 D 20.6 (19-23) 15.0 (13-17) 35.9 (31-41)
 E 2.4(2-3) 1.5 (1-2) 4.9 (3-8)
 Undetermined 13.3 (12-15) 13.3 (11-15) 13.3 (10-17)

Scale variables Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)

Age 49.6 (13.9) 48.3 (13.3) 53.1 (14.9) <.001
Years since injury 18.5 (14.3) 18.5 (13.1) 18.7 (17.1) NS
Age at injury, years 31.1 (17.0) 29.9 (14.9) 34.5 (21.6) <.001
a

Significance or not statistically significant (NS) between people with a TR or NT lesion, chi-square (category variables) or t test (scale variables).

b

Percentage of those who answered the question. Income is given in Canadian dollars.

c

The participants could choose all answers that applied to their situation.

d

The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) was evaluated indirectly from participants’ answers about their lesion and sensorimotor and mobility capabilities.