Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 8;4(1):35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.11.002

Table 1.

Comparison of linear measurements between manual and digital techniques.

S. no Parameter Manual (mean ± SD) Digital (mean ± SD) Difference (mean ± SD) t p r
1. AFH 106.08 ± 7.04 104.95 ± 7.61 1.13 ± 1.40 5.081 0.000 0.985
2. PFH 73.06 ± 7.08 72.45 ± 7.83 0.61 ± 1.71 2.251 0.030 0.979
3. Ramus Height 44.30 ± 5.78 44.37 ± 6.30 −0.07 ± 2.35 −0.195 0.846 0.928
4. ULL 18.95 ± 2.41 18.47 ± 2.61 0.48 ± 1.47 2.059 0.046 0.832
5. LLL 41.15 ± 4.65 40.23 ± 4.97 0.92 ± 1.67 3.497 0.001 0.942
6. ACBL 65.26 ± 4.17 64.20 ± 4.65 1.06 ± 1.65 4.070 <0.001 0.935
7. PCBL 33.90 ± 3.58 32.48 ± 4.20 1.42 ± 1.75 5.135 <0.001 0.911
8. MxL 44.46 ± 2.69 43.64 ± 3.13 0.83 ± 2.21 2.357 0.024 0.720
9. MdL 65.70 ± 5.64 65.04 ± 6.40 0.66 ± 2.05 2.029 0.049 0.950
10. U1 to NA 7.35 ± 3.24 7.34 ± 3.25 0.01 ± 1.05 0.060 0.952 0.947
11. L1 to NB 7.36 ± 2.69 6.87 ± 2.81 0.49 ± 0.76 4.077 <0.001 0.963
12. ULP 6.21 ± 2.25 6.08 ± 2.55 0.13 ± 1.18 0.699 0.489 0.888
13. LLP 5.88 ± 2.72 5.25 ± 2.75 0.63 ± 0.83 4.758 <0.001 0.954

p < 0.05 – Significant; p < 0.01 – Very significant; p < 0.001 – Most significant.