Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Psychol. 2014 Aug 27;0:1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.07.003

Table 2.

Results of the logistic regression model in Experiment 1, including all within-subjects variables as fixed effects, with by-subject intercepts and slopes as random effects. The intercept reflects aggregate performance in the reference condition: novel-grammatical vs. novel-ungrammatical, Block 1, Paradigm A. NGvNU = novel-grammatical vs. novel-ungrammatical, RvS = repeated vs. scrambled.

Estimate Std. Error Wald’s Z p-value
Intercept (reference condition:
NGvNU, Paradigm A, Block 1)
−0.2513 .2057 −1.222 .22189
Trial Type (NGvNU vs. RvS) 1.6042 .3906 4.107 4.01×10−5
Block (1 vs. 2) 0.7700 .3031 2.541 .01106
Paradigm (A vs. B) 0.8947 .3495 2.560 .01047
Trial Type X Block −1.2871 .4542 −2.834 .00460
Trial Type X Paradigm −1.2704 .5158 −2.463 .01378
Block X Paradigm −0.9709 .4806 −2.020 .04335
Trial Type X Block X Paradigm 1.8828 .6681 2.818 .00483