Table 2.
Estimated Transition Probability | AOR (95% CI)a
p-value |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
No problems | Externalizing Behavior Problems |
Academic and Attention/ Concentration Problems |
Externalizing vs. No problems |
Academic and Attention/ Concentration Problems vs. No Problems |
Externalizing vs. Academic and Attention/ Concentration Problems |
|
No involvement to offered marijuana |
||||||
| ||||||
6th to 7th | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 1.33 (0.66, 2.67) p=0.422 |
0.90 (0.28, 2.83) p=0.857 |
1.48 (0.43, 5.10) p=0.534 |
7th to 8th | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.72 (0.35, 1.49) p=0.376 |
0.44 (0.13, 1.54) p=0.199 |
1.63 (0.42, 6.37) p=0.482 |
8th to 9th | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 1.63 (0.79, 3.37) p=0.187 |
0.22 (0.04, 1.21) p=0.082 |
7.25 (1.25, 41.92) p=0.027 |
| ||||||
No involvement to use and problems |
||||||
| ||||||
6th to 7th | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 2.37 (0.65, 8.59) p=0.189 |
3.40 (0.78, 14.81) p=0.103 |
0.70 (0.14, 3.41) p=0.659 |
7th to 8th | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 10.83 (2.16, 54.39) p=0.004 |
10.69 (1.73, 66.13) p=0.011 |
1.01 (0.23, 4.39) p=0.989 |
8th to 9th | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 1.96 (0.53, 7.18) p=0.310 |
3.55 (0.99, 12.76) p=0.052 |
0.55 (0.12, 2.60) p=0.451 |
| ||||||
Offered marijuana to use and problems |
||||||
| ||||||
6th to 7th | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.65 (0.15, 2.79) p=0.562 |
0.70 (0.10, 9.00) p=0.784 |
0.95 (0.09, 10.49) p=0.967 |
7th to 8th | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.34 (0.06, 1.86) p=0.213 |
--b | --b |
8th to 9th | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.50 | 1.27 (0.18, 8.80) p=0.809 |
5.99 (1.37, 26.12) p=0.017 |
0.21 (0.04, 1.06) p=0.059 |
Models adjusted for gender, intervention status, and free or reduced lunch status
Youth with academic and attention/concentration problems had a zero probability of transitioning from being offered marijuana to marijuana use and problems in 7th to 8th grades.