Table 3.
a. This table illustrates the preferred number of flexible rooms given various combinations in changes to low- and high-acuity patient volumes. Additionally, this table shows the difference in mean wait times for the preferred number of flexible beds as compared to the optimal 3-bed Flex Track policy. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
**All Times are in Minutes (99% CI)** | |||||||
Changes to High- Acuity Patient Volume |
Changes to Low -Acuity Patient Volume |
Preferred Number of Flex Beds |
Mean Wait for Optimal Policy vs. 3-bed Flex Track Policy | ||||
Overall | ESI 2 | ESI 3 | ESI 4 | ESI 5 | |||
10% Decrease | No Change | 4 | 0.02 (0.00 to 0.04) | −0.2 (−0.21 to −0.19) | −1.9 (−1.94 to −1.86) | 1.8 (1.73 to 1.87) | 5.5 (5.3 to 5.7) |
5% Decrease | 3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
5% Increase | 3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
No Change | 10% Decrease | 4 | −0.7 (−0.75 to −0.65) | −0.4 (−0.41 to −0.39) | −5.4 (−5.48 to −5.32) | 4.3 (4.1 to 4.5) | 16.3 (15.8 to 16.8) |
5% Decrease | 4 | −0.3 (−0.35 to −0.25) | −0.4 (−0.41 to −0.39) | −5.4 (−5.48 to −5.32) | 5.0 (4.8 to 5.2) | 18.0 (17.4 to 18.6) | |
10% Increase | 3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
15% Increase | 2 | −0.2 (−0.27 to −0.13) | 0.5 (0.49 to 0.51) | 7.1 (7.09 to 7.11) | −5.9 (−6.1 to −5.7) | −23.9 (−24.6 to −23.1) | |
10% Decrease | 5% Increase | 3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
5% Decrease | 5% Decrease | 4 | −0.2 (−0.23 to −0.17) | −0.3 (−0.31 to −0.29) | −3.3 (−3.35 to −3.25) | 3.0 (2.9 to 3.1) | 9.8 (9.5 to 10.1) |
5% Decrease | 15% Increase | 2 | −0.05 (−0.09 to −0.01) | 0.4 (0.39 to 0.41) | 4.3 (4.24 to 4.36) | −3.5 (−3.6 to −3.4) | −13.0 (−13.3 to −12.7) |
5% Increase | 5% Decrease | 4 | −0.4 (−0.48 to −0.32) | −0.5 (−0.51 to −0.49) | −8.9 (−9.0 to −8.8) | 8.0 (7.8 to 8.2) | 32.7 (31.6 to 33.8) |
b. This table illustrates the preferred number of flexible rooms given various combinations in changes to low- and high-acuity patient volumes. Additionally, this table shows the difference in mean wait times for the preferred number of flexible beds as compared to a standard Fast Track policy. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
**All Times are in Minutes (99% CI)** | |||||||
Changes to High- Acuity Patient Volume |
Changes to Low- Acuity Patient Volume |
Preferred Number of Flex Beds |
Mean Wait for Optimal Policy vs. Fast Track Policy | ||||
Overall | ESI 2 | ESI 3 | ESI 4 | ESI 5 | |||
10% Decrease | No Change | 4 | −3.1 (−3.17 to −3.03) | −1.2 (−1.3 to −1.1) | −12.1 (−12.3 to −11.9) | 5.1 (4.9 to 5.3) | 13.5 (13.1 to 13.9) |
5% Decrease | 3 | −5.4 (−5.5 to −5.3) | −1.5 (−1.52 to −1.48) | −17.3 (−17.6 to −17.0) | 5.3 (5.1 to 5.5) | 24.0 (23.4 to 24.6) | |
5% Increase | 3 | −18.7 (−19.2 to −18.2) | −2.2 (−2.0 to −2.4) | −52.4 (−53.5 to −51.3) | 11.8 (11.5 to 12.1) | 71.3 (69.2 to 73.4) | |
No Change | 10% Decrease | 4 | −12.9 (−13.2 to −12.6) | −2.4 (−2.42 to −2.38) | −34.9 (−35.5 to −34.3) | 9.7 (9.4 to 10.0) | 44.0 (42.8 to 45.2) |
5% Decrease | 4 | −11.3 (−11.5 to −11.1) | −2.3 (−2.32 to −2.28) | −34.7 (−35.2 to −34.2) | 11.6 (11.3 to 11.9) | 33.8 (33.0 to 34.6) | |
10% Increase | 3 | −6.7 (−6.9 to −6.5) | −1.8 (−1.82 to −1.78) | −29.1 (−29.6 to −28.6) | 11.2 (10.9 to 11.5) | 56.7 (55.2 to 58.2) | |
15% Increase | 2 | −5.3 (−5.5 to −5.1) | −1.3 (−1.32 to −1.28) | −22.0 (−22.4 to −21.6) | 7.0 (6.8 to 7.2) | 40.8 (39.5 to 42.1) | |
10% Decrease | 5% Increase | 3 | −2.6 (−2.67 to −2.53) | −1.1 (−1.11 to −1.09) | −10.2 (−10.4 to −10.0) | 3.9 (3.8 to 4.0) | 15.7 (15.3 to 16.1) |
5% Decrease | 5% Decrease | 4 | −6.4 (−6.5 to −6.3) | −1.8 (−1.82 to −1.78) | −20.6 (−20.9 to −20.3) | 7.4 (7.2 to 7.6) | 30.1 (29.3 to 30.9) |
5% Decrease | 15% Increase | 2 | −2.9 (−2.82 to −2.98) | −1.0 (−1.01 to −0.99) | −13.0 (−13.2 to −12.8) | 4.6 (4.5 to 4.7) | 22.8 (22.2 to 23.4) |
5% Increase | 5% Decrease | 4 | −21.6 (−22.1 to −21.1) | −2.8 (−2.82 to −2.78) | −61.8 (−63.1 to −60.5) | 17.9 (17.4 to 18.4) | 90.3 (88.0 to 92.6) |
Note: If the value in the table is negative, the mean wait for the Optimal Policy is less than the 3-bed Flex Track Policy (by the amount listed), if the value is positive, the mean wait time for the Optimal Policy is greater than the 3-bed Flex Track Policy (by the amount listed).
Note: If the value in the table is negative, the mean wait for the Optimal Policy is less than the Fast Track Policy (by the amount listed), if the value is positive, the mean wait time for the Optimal Policy is greater than the Fast Track Policy (by the amount listed).