Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 10;24(11):861–867.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.09.002

Table 3.

Comparing sexual, HIV and HCV- related variables between groups randomized by recruitment chain, among Seattle-area participants in the 2012 NHBS-IDU survey: First randomization

Group 1 (Chains 1,5,6) Group 2 (Chains 2,3,4,7,8,9) p-value
RDS- adjusted estimate 95% C.I. RDS- adjusted estimate 95% C.I.
Male-to-male sexa (Percentages)
 No 91 (87 – 96) 86 (75 – 95) .03
 Yes 9 (4 – 13) 14 (6 – 25)
Number sex partnersa
 0 20 (10 – 30) 17 (11 – 22) .70
 1 39 (30 – 50) 41 (33 – 50)
 2 – 4 28 (20 – 35) 30 (23 – 37)
 5 – 9 8 (5 – 13) 6 (3 – 10)
 10 + 6 (3 – 9) 6 (3 – 9)
Unprotected, non-concordant sexa,b
 No 73 (65 – 81) 77 (71 – 83) .25
 Yes 27 (20 – 35) 23 (17 – 29)
HIV test, 12 months
 No 49 (38 – 60) 62 (55 – 71) .001
 Yes 51 (41 – 62) 38 (29 – 45)
HIV test, 3 months
 No 83 (75 – 88) 84 (78 – 90) .68
 Yes 17 (12 – 25) 16 (10 – 22)
Serologic HIV status
 Negative 96 (92 – 99.6) 82 (69 – 94) 2 × 10−10
 Positive 4 (0.4 – 8) 18 (7 – 31)
Serologic HCV status
 Negative 29 (20 – 38) 32 (23 – 40) .47
 Positive 71 (62 – 80) 69 (60 – 77)

 N (total)
295 393
a

Previous 12 months

b

Vaginal or anal sex without a condom with a partner of unknown HIV status or a status opposite to that of the participant.