Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014 Aug 7;0:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.07.001

Table 1.

Using CCG to identify poses consistent with observed binding specificity for the TF-disaccharide in complex with the mAb JAA-F11

Predicted Overlaps Consistent
with Experimenta

Experimental Bindersb Pose 1 Pose 2 Pose 3 Pose 4
Galβ1-3GalNAcα Y Y Y Y
Neu5Acβ2-6(Galβ1-3)GalNAcα Y Y -c Y
Neu5Acα2-6(Galβ1-3)GalNAcα Y - - Y
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6(Galβ1-3)GalNAcα Y Y - Y
GlcNAcβ1-6(Galβ1-3)GalNAcα Y Y - Y

Experimental Non-Bindersb

Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GalNAcα Y Y - Y
GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα Y Y - Y
GlcNAcβ1-2Galβ1-3GalNAcα Y Y - Y
(3S)Galβ1-3GalNAcα Y - - Y
Neu5Acα2-6(Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3)GalNAcα Y Y Y Y
6S(Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3)GalNAcα Y Y - Y
Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα Y Y - Y
GalNAcβ1-3GalNAcα Y - - Y
Galβ1-3GalNAcβ Y Y Y -
Galβ1-3GalNAcβ1-4Galβ1-4Glcβ Y Y Y -
a

A relative buried surface area of greater than 1 (relative to the surface are of a carbon atom (~36 Å2)) was used to categorise a predicted glycan as being a non-binder.

b

Experimental binding was based on a mean relative fluorescence signal greater than 10% of the maximum signal at each protein concentration.

c

A dash denotes that the predicted overlaps were inconsistent with the experimental array data.