Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Sep 6;60(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.08.022

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Histology showing the entire condyles at 4X magnification (scale bars = 1 mm). Boxes indicate the areas shown in Figures 8 and 9 at 10X magnification. Figure 8 shows the anterior regions (boxes on the left of the images). Figure 9 shows the posterior regions (boxes on the right of the images). Staining used for comparison included H&E, Saf-O for GAG staining, and Collagen Type 2 immunostain. The right and left condyles of control animals were compared to the left (contralateral) and right (treated) condyles of splinted animals. Representative pictures shown from at least n=3.