Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 9;101(2):63–68. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9349

Table 1.

Characteristics, treatment and outcome of patients with bile duct injury after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy

All patients (n = 27) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 14) Open cholecystectomy (n = 13)
Age (years)* 57 (35–65) 48 (35–65) 58 (42–63)
Sex ratio (M : F) 10 : 17 6 : 8 4 : 9
Diagnosis of BDI
  Intraoperative 15 8 7
  Postoperative 12 6 6
Bismuth–Strasberg classification of biliary injury
  E2 4 1 3
  E3 11 3 8
  E4 12 10 2
Vascular injury
  RHA 4 4 0
  CHA 1 1 0
  CHA + PV 2 2 0
Treatment of BDI
  Surgical 24 13 11
  Conservative 3 1 2
No. of interventions before LT
  Surgical 2 (1–5) 2 (1–3) 2 (1–5)
  Radiological and/or endoscopic 17 (2–6) 7 (2–6) 10 (2–5)
Time from BDI to LT (months)* 36 (0·02–276) 21 (0·02–232) 60 (24–276)
*

Values are median (range). Bismuth–Strasberg classification: E2, stricture less than 2 cm from confluence and less than 2 cm of common hepatic duct present; E3, no common hepatic duct but confluence patent, and right and left systems communicating; E4, confluence strictured and the two systems isolated.

Total hepatectomy (1 patient), Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (24) and/or hepatic resection (6).

Radiological and/or endoscopic procedures. BDI, bile duct injury; RHA, right hepatic artery; CHA common hepatic artery; PV, portal vein; LT, liver transplantation.