Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dent. 2014 Sep 16;42(12):1528–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.005

Table 2.

Number of restorations replaced and repaired by all dentists (n=8,186), by original dentist (n=1,920), and not by original dentist (n=6,266) according to tooth type, material of the original restoration, arch location, number of surfaces, reason for defect, and number of defective restorations per patient.*

Characteristics All dentists
n=8,186
Original dentist
n=1,920
Not original dentist
n=6,226
Tooth type Replaced n
(%)
Repaired n
(%)
Replaced n (%) Repaired n (%) Replaced n (%) Repaired n (%)
Molar tooth (n=4,569) 3,284 (72) 1,285 (28) 599 (61) 383 (39) 2,685 (75) 902 (25)
Premolar, anterior (n=3,617) 2,747 (76) 870 (24) 658 (70) 280 (30) 2,089 (78) 590 (22)
Material
Amalgam (n=2,155) 1,212 (56) 943 (44) 570 (72) 227 (28) 3,212 (82) 716 (18)
Not amalgam (n=6,031) 4,819 (65) 1,212 (35) 687 (61) 436 (39) 1,562 (67) 776 (33)
Arch location
Upper arch (n=4,588) 3,372 (74) 1,216 (26) 732 (67) 360 (33) 2,640 (75) 856 (25)
Lower arch (n=3,598) 2,659 (74) 939 (26) 525 (46) 606 (54) 2,134 (77) 636 (23)
Surface
Single surface (n=1,822) 1,246 (69) 576 (31) 242 (61) 157 (39) 1,004 (71) 419 (29)
Two surfaces (n=2,913) 2,288 (79) 625 (21) 459 (69) 202 (31) 1,829 (81) 423 (19)
Three surfaces (n=2,033) 1,400 (70) 633 (30) 302 (61) 192 (39) 1,108 (72) 431 (28)
Four more surfaces (n=1,418) 1,006 (71) 412 (29) 254 (69) 112 (31) 752 (72) 300 (28)
Reason
Fracture reason for defect (n=2,484) 1,845 (74) 639 (26) 443 (68) 200 (32) 1,402 (76) 439 (24)
Another reason for defect (n=5,702) 4,186 (63) 1,516 (27) 814 (64) 463 (36) 3,372 (76) 1,053 (24)
Number of defective restoration
1 defective restoration (n=4,645) 3,445 (74) 1,200 (26) 761 (66) 392 (34) 2,684 (77) 808 (23)
2 defective restorations (n=2,250) 1,615 (72) 635 (28) 312 (66) 162 (34) 1,303 (74) 473 (26)
3–4 defective restorations (n=1,291) 971 (75) 320 (25) 184 (63) 109 (37) 787 (79) 211 (21)
*

because the numbers in this table differ from those in Table 1 (e.g., 2,147 in Table 1 for “dentist placed the original restoration” compared to 1,920 in Table 2).